Referees' decision making about transgressions: The influence of player gender at the highest national level

Nicolas Souchon, Cabagno Geneviéve, Olivier Rascle, Alan Traclet, Fabrice Dosseville, Gregory R Maio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research has found that referees are harsher toward sporting offenses in regional-level matches between women than in regional-level matches between men. We tested whether this bias also occurs at a higher, national level of competition, despite the greater pressures for objectivity and fairness at this level. Referees' decisions were examined in 15 national-level handball matches between women and 15 national-level handball matches between men after transgressions that varied in severity. The results suggest that referees made harsher decisions in female than in male matches. Although more research is needed, this study supported the hypothesis that referees may use the gender of players as a powerful judgmental heuristic for deciding how to respond to aggression.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-452
Number of pages8
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Referees' decision making about transgressions: The influence of player gender at the highest national level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this