TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconciling participatory and evidence-based policymaking in the EU Better Regulation policy
T2 - mission (im)possible?
AU - Bunea, Adriana
AU - Chrisp, Joe
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Raimondas Ibenskas and the anonymous referees for their constructive and helpful feedback. During the work on the revision and resubmission stage of the manuscript, Adriana Bunea was a Fernand Braudel Fellow at the European University Institute, in the SPS Department. This fellowship is gratefully acknowledged.
PY - 2022/11/11
Y1 - 2022/11/11
N2 - Modern systems of governance are increasingly adopting measures aimed at fostering public participation in policymaking, while embedding decisions in scientific evidence under the label of Better Regulation policy. Existing research identifies tensions between participatory and evidence-based approaches. This prompts questions about one of the most ambitious reforms to combine and enhance participatory and evidence-based tools of policymaking, initiated by the European Commission in 2016. We assess the extent to which this reform successfully combined and expanded the participatory layer of supranational policymaking while also strengthening its evidence-based credentials by analysing stakeholders’ evaluations. We find that stakeholders assess both sets of measures as part of a single, integrated dimension. Participatory measures received slightly better appraisals and were better known, but both sets of measures were evaluated positively and there are no significant differences in evaluations across stakeholder categories. This points to the complementarity of measures from a stakeholder perspective.
AB - Modern systems of governance are increasingly adopting measures aimed at fostering public participation in policymaking, while embedding decisions in scientific evidence under the label of Better Regulation policy. Existing research identifies tensions between participatory and evidence-based approaches. This prompts questions about one of the most ambitious reforms to combine and enhance participatory and evidence-based tools of policymaking, initiated by the European Commission in 2016. We assess the extent to which this reform successfully combined and expanded the participatory layer of supranational policymaking while also strengthening its evidence-based credentials by analysing stakeholders’ evaluations. We find that stakeholders assess both sets of measures as part of a single, integrated dimension. Participatory measures received slightly better appraisals and were better known, but both sets of measures were evaluated positively and there are no significant differences in evaluations across stakeholder categories. This points to the complementarity of measures from a stakeholder perspective.
KW - Better Regulation policy
KW - European Commission
KW - participatory and evidence-based policymaking
KW - regulatory governance
KW - stakeholder consultations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142165954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07036337.2022.2144848
DO - 10.1080/07036337.2022.2144848
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142165954
JO - Journal of European Integration
JF - Journal of European Integration
SN - 0703-6337
ER -