Reconceptualising and redefining educational leadership practice

Chris James, Michael Connolly, Melissa Hawkins

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Accepted definitions of educational leadership practice typically view it as influence to achieve organisational goals. Such definitions have been widely used over the last 30 years. During that time, the number of educational leadership theories/models has increased and cover the many aspects of educational leadership all of which implicitly or explicitly use the accepted definition. However, the accepted definition is open to critique in a range of important ways and we consider that a more robust definition is required. In this article, we reconceptualise and redefine educational leadership practice as ‘legitimate interaction in an educational institution intended to enhance engagement with the institutional primary task’. We analyse the concepts underpinning the key aspects of that definition: the institutional context of educational leadership practice; legitimacy and educational leadership practice; the interactional nature of educational leadership practice; institutionalisation and institutions; the notion of engagement and the necessary conditions of capability, opportunity and motivation; and the institutional primary task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)618-635
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Leadership in Education
Volume23
Issue number5
Early online date7 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reconceptualising and redefining educational leadership practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this