Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability

Yifei Wang, Yinghong Lan, Daniel Weinreich, Nicholas Priest, Joanna Bryson

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Recombination is ubiquitous in multicellular plants, animals and even fungi. Many studies have shown that recombination can generate a great amount of genetic innovations, but it is also believed to damage well-adapted lineages, causing debates over how organisms cope with such disruptions. Using an established model of artificial gene regulatory networks, here we show that recombination may not be as destructive as expected. Provided only that there is selection for developmental stability, recombination can establish and maintain lineages with reliably better phenotypes compared to asexual reproduction. Contrary to expectation, this does not appear to be a simple side effect of higher levels of variation. A simple model of the underlying dynamics demonstrates a surprisingly high robustness in these lineages against the disruption caused by recombination. Contrary to expectation, lineages subject to recombination are less likely to produce offspring suffering truncation selection for instability than asexual lineages subject to simple mutation. These findings indicate the fundamental differences between recombination and high mutation rates, which has important implications for understanding both biological innovation and hierarchically structured models of machine learning.

Conference

ConferenceThe 13th European Conference on Artificial Life
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityYork
Period20/07/1524/07/15

Fingerprint

Synthetic Genes
Gene Regulatory Networks
Genetic Recombination
Asexual Reproduction
Mutation Rate
Fungi
Phenotype
Mutation

Keywords

  • Evolution Dynamics
  • Recombination
  • Gene Regulatory Networks
  • Developmental Stability
  • Evolution of Sex
  • Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction
  • Genetic Innovations
  • Evolvability
  • Hierarchical Network Structure
  • Machine Learning

Cite this

Wang, Y., Lan, Y., Weinreich, D., Priest, N., & Bryson, J. (2015). Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability. 530. Paper presented at The 13th European Conference on Artificial Life, York, UK United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.7551/978-0-262-33027-5-ch094

Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability. / Wang, Yifei; Lan, Yinghong; Weinreich, Daniel; Priest, Nicholas; Bryson, Joanna.

2015. 530 Paper presented at The 13th European Conference on Artificial Life, York, UK United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Wang, Y, Lan, Y, Weinreich, D, Priest, N & Bryson, J 2015, 'Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability' Paper presented at The 13th European Conference on Artificial Life, York, UK United Kingdom, 20/07/15 - 24/07/15, pp. 530. https://doi.org/10.7551/978-0-262-33027-5-ch094
Wang, Yifei ; Lan, Yinghong ; Weinreich, Daniel ; Priest, Nicholas ; Bryson, Joanna. / Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability. Paper presented at The 13th European Conference on Artificial Life, York, UK United Kingdom.537 p.
@conference{7e2c39f1f1cf47c6873a27216181d694,
title = "Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability",
abstract = "Recombination is ubiquitous in multicellular plants, animals and even fungi. Many studies have shown that recombination can generate a great amount of genetic innovations, but it is also believed to damage well-adapted lineages, causing debates over how organisms cope with such disruptions. Using an established model of artificial gene regulatory networks, here we show that recombination may not be as destructive as expected. Provided only that there is selection for developmental stability, recombination can establish and maintain lineages with reliably better phenotypes compared to asexual reproduction. Contrary to expectation, this does not appear to be a simple side effect of higher levels of variation. A simple model of the underlying dynamics demonstrates a surprisingly high robustness in these lineages against the disruption caused by recombination. Contrary to expectation, lineages subject to recombination are less likely to produce offspring suffering truncation selection for instability than asexual lineages subject to simple mutation. These findings indicate the fundamental differences between recombination and high mutation rates, which has important implications for understanding both biological innovation and hierarchically structured models of machine learning.",
keywords = "Evolution Dynamics, Recombination, Gene Regulatory Networks, Developmental Stability, Evolution of Sex, Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction, Genetic Innovations, Evolvability, Hierarchical Network Structure, Machine Learning",
author = "Yifei Wang and Yinghong Lan and Daniel Weinreich and Nicholas Priest and Joanna Bryson",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
doi = "10.7551/978-0-262-33027-5-ch094",
language = "English",
pages = "530",
note = "The 13th European Conference on Artificial Life ; Conference date: 20-07-2015 Through 24-07-2015",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability

AU - Wang, Yifei

AU - Lan, Yinghong

AU - Weinreich, Daniel

AU - Priest, Nicholas

AU - Bryson, Joanna

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - Recombination is ubiquitous in multicellular plants, animals and even fungi. Many studies have shown that recombination can generate a great amount of genetic innovations, but it is also believed to damage well-adapted lineages, causing debates over how organisms cope with such disruptions. Using an established model of artificial gene regulatory networks, here we show that recombination may not be as destructive as expected. Provided only that there is selection for developmental stability, recombination can establish and maintain lineages with reliably better phenotypes compared to asexual reproduction. Contrary to expectation, this does not appear to be a simple side effect of higher levels of variation. A simple model of the underlying dynamics demonstrates a surprisingly high robustness in these lineages against the disruption caused by recombination. Contrary to expectation, lineages subject to recombination are less likely to produce offspring suffering truncation selection for instability than asexual lineages subject to simple mutation. These findings indicate the fundamental differences between recombination and high mutation rates, which has important implications for understanding both biological innovation and hierarchically structured models of machine learning.

AB - Recombination is ubiquitous in multicellular plants, animals and even fungi. Many studies have shown that recombination can generate a great amount of genetic innovations, but it is also believed to damage well-adapted lineages, causing debates over how organisms cope with such disruptions. Using an established model of artificial gene regulatory networks, here we show that recombination may not be as destructive as expected. Provided only that there is selection for developmental stability, recombination can establish and maintain lineages with reliably better phenotypes compared to asexual reproduction. Contrary to expectation, this does not appear to be a simple side effect of higher levels of variation. A simple model of the underlying dynamics demonstrates a surprisingly high robustness in these lineages against the disruption caused by recombination. Contrary to expectation, lineages subject to recombination are less likely to produce offspring suffering truncation selection for instability than asexual lineages subject to simple mutation. These findings indicate the fundamental differences between recombination and high mutation rates, which has important implications for understanding both biological innovation and hierarchically structured models of machine learning.

KW - Evolution Dynamics

KW - Recombination

KW - Gene Regulatory Networks

KW - Developmental Stability

KW - Evolution of Sex

KW - Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction

KW - Genetic Innovations

KW - Evolvability

KW - Hierarchical Network Structure

KW - Machine Learning

UR - https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/ecal2015/ch094.html

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/978-0-262-33027-5-ch094

U2 - 10.7551/978-0-262-33027-5-ch094

DO - 10.7551/978-0-262-33027-5-ch094

M3 - Paper

SP - 530

ER -