Abstract
We challenge a stream of thought that focuses on drawing what we see as a frivolous contrast between creation and discovery view of entrepreneurship. Its detachment from the empirical world is tantamount to theoretical “fetishism”. We see opportunities as emergent structures, with ontologically real components, epistemologically real functional relationships, and requiring real human actions and interactions to come to fruition. This calls for building theory based on the strengths of both discovery and creation assumptions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 168-170 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Management Inquiry |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 4 Sep 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Feb 2016 |
Keywords
- creation
- discovery
- entrepreneurship
- ontology
- opportunities
- philosophy of science
- realism
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Realism, empiricism, and fetishism in the study of entrepreneurship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Crawford, G. C., Dimov, D., & McKelvey, B. (2016). Realism, empiricism, and fetishism in the study of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(2), 168-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615601506