Abstract
Introduction – Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors have substantially changed melanoma management in both the adjuvant and advanced settings. This study aimed to estimate the percentage of stage III and IV melanoma patients exposed to different therapies and describe treatment patterns among anti-PD-1-treated patients.
Methods – We performed a retrospective chart review across 22 centers in Australia, France, Germany, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Two patient populations were analyzed: (1) an aggregate cohort with stage III/IV melanoma (2018-2021), and (2) patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy in adjuvant or advanced settings from January 2018–12 months before data collection. Treatment patterns were evaluated.
Results – In the aggregate cohort (N = 16, 260), observation/watchful waiting predominated in stage III patients (56.8%) in the adjuvant setting, whereas systemic therapy was most common for stage IV disease in the advanced setting. In the anti-PD-1 cohort (N = 738), anti-PD-1 monotherapy predominated in the adjuvant setting (97.5%), while both anti-PD-1 monotherapy (63.1%) and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 (36.9%) were commonly used in the advanced setting. Across successive lines of therapy, anti-PD-1-based regimens remained frequently used despite substantial attrition between treatment lines. Disease progression was the leading cause of treatment discontinuation in advanced disease.
Discussion – This real-world study highlights the central role of anti-PD-1 therapy across disease stages. Anti-PD-1 retreatment and reuse of anti-PD-1-based regimens were frequently observed across treatment lines, highlighting the limited availability of established post-anti-PD-1 treatment options. Novel strategies are urgently needed for patients progressing after anti-PD-1 therapy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1813387 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Immunology |
| Volume | 17 |
| Early online date | 23 Jul 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Jul 2026 |
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the contributions of the participating sites and clinicians across the 22 academic centers across six countries. We thank the data managers and research coordinators for their valuable support in data collection.Funding
The authors declare that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. The sponsor provided funding for data collection, statistical support, and medical writing. Sponsor-employed authors contributed to the study and manuscript as described in the Author Contributions section. Grant number: N/A.
Keywords
- adjuvant setting
- advanced
- anti-PD-1
- melanoma
- real-world data
- treatment patterns
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Immunology and Allergy
- Immunology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world treatment patterns in stage III and IV melanoma patients: insights from a global multi-center chart review study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS