Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-world treatment patterns in stage III and IV melanoma patients: insights from a global multi-center chart review study

  • Miso Kim
  • , Elizabeth M. Gaughan
  • , Agueda Azpeitia
  • , Aparna Rao
  • , Maria L. Wei
  • , Alexandra So
  • , Xiaochen Zhong
  • , Carola Berking
  • , Ruixuan Jiang
  • , Stéphane Dalle
  • , Caroline Robert
  • , Salma Alam
  • , Tessa Davies
  • , Dirk Debus
  • , Marcin Dzienis
  • , Sarah Danson
  • , Ricky Frazer
  • , Christoffer Gebhardt
  • , Glenn Geidel
  • , Jessica C. Hassel
  • Inga Hansen, Markus V. Heppt, Lina Hildebrandt, James Isaacs, Koung Jin Suh, Bhumsuk Keam, Yu Jung Kim, Thierry Lesimple, Phillipe Saiag, Ryan Weight, Alicia Delibes, Rosemarie Barnett, Clemens Krepler, Kavita Gandhi, Nawab Qizilbash, Irene Shui, Xiang Lin Tan, Ryan J. Sullivan
  • Seoul National University Hospital
  • University of Virginia Cancer Center
  • OXON Epidemiology
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
  • Melanoma Research Victoria
  • University of California San Francisco
  • Vet. Administration Medical Center
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
  • Merck & Co., Inc.
  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
  • Velindre University NHS Trust
  • Paracelsus Medical University
  • Gold Coast University Hospital
  • Weston Park Cancer Centre
  • University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Laboratory for Dermatopathology
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
  • Centre Eugéne Marquis
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • The Melanoma and Skin Cancer Institute
  • Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Massachusetts General Brigham Cancer Institute

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction – Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors have substantially changed melanoma management in both the adjuvant and advanced settings. This study aimed to estimate the percentage of stage III and IV melanoma patients exposed to different therapies and describe treatment patterns among anti-PD-1-treated patients. 

Methods – We performed a retrospective chart review across 22 centers in Australia, France, Germany, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Two patient populations were analyzed: (1) an aggregate cohort with stage III/IV melanoma (2018-2021), and (2) patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy in adjuvant or advanced settings from January 2018–12 months before data collection. Treatment patterns were evaluated. 

Results – In the aggregate cohort (N = 16, 260), observation/watchful waiting predominated in stage III patients (56.8%) in the adjuvant setting, whereas systemic therapy was most common for stage IV disease in the advanced setting. In the anti-PD-1 cohort (N = 738), anti-PD-1 monotherapy predominated in the adjuvant setting (97.5%), while both anti-PD-1 monotherapy (63.1%) and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 (36.9%) were commonly used in the advanced setting. Across successive lines of therapy, anti-PD-1-based regimens remained frequently used despite substantial attrition between treatment lines. Disease progression was the leading cause of treatment discontinuation in advanced disease. 

Discussion – This real-world study highlights the central role of anti-PD-1 therapy across disease stages. Anti-PD-1 retreatment and reuse of anti-PD-1-based regimens were frequently observed across treatment lines, highlighting the limited availability of established post-anti-PD-1 treatment options. Novel strategies are urgently needed for patients progressing after anti-PD-1 therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1813387
Number of pages14
JournalFrontiers in Immunology
Volume17
Early online date23 Jul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jul 2026

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the contributions of the participating sites and clinicians across the 22 academic centers across six countries. We thank the data managers and research coordinators for their valuable support in data collection.

Funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. The sponsor provided funding for data collection, statistical support, and medical writing. Sponsor-employed authors contributed to the study and manuscript as described in the Author Contributions section. Grant number: N/A.

Keywords

  • adjuvant setting
  • advanced
  • anti-PD-1
  • melanoma
  • real-world data
  • treatment patterns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world treatment patterns in stage III and IV melanoma patients: insights from a global multi-center chart review study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this