Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties

J. L. Rees, D. J. Beard, A. J. Price, H. S. Gill, P. McLardy-Smith, C. A. Dodd, D. W. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We did an in vivo fluoroscopic study comparing the sagittal plane kinematics of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties in a unique group of patients. These patients were part of a larger bilateral randomized controlled outcome trial with each patient having received both types of total knee arthroplasties. Invited patients did three exercises with each of their different knee replacements; extension against gravity, flexion against gravity, and a step-up. These exercises were recorded using video fluoroscopy, and a series of still digital images over the flexion range were retrieved. The relationship of patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle for each patient was derived. The patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle of the mobile-bearing knee behaved in a linear manner more closely replicating the normal knee, whereas the fixed-bearing knee behaved in a nonlinear, more variable manner. This pattern of results was similar for all three exercises with each patient having one knee replacement that behaved differently in the sagittal plane when compared with their other knee replacement. These kinematic differences may explain the clinical differences observed in the randomized controlled trials that compared these two total knee arthroplasties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-209
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number432
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Biomechanical Phenomena
Knee
Patellar Ligament
Gravitation
Exercise
Randomized Controlled Trials
Fluoroscopy

Cite this

Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties. / Rees, J. L.; Beard, D. J.; Price, A. J.; Gill, H. S.; McLardy-Smith, P.; Dodd, C. A.; Murray, D. W.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 432, 2005, p. 204-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rees, J. L. ; Beard, D. J. ; Price, A. J. ; Gill, H. S. ; McLardy-Smith, P. ; Dodd, C. A. ; Murray, D. W. / Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2005 ; No. 432. pp. 204-209.
@article{008c7597d30b49aaafdbd5e1746f1f40,
title = "Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties",
abstract = "We did an in vivo fluoroscopic study comparing the sagittal plane kinematics of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties in a unique group of patients. These patients were part of a larger bilateral randomized controlled outcome trial with each patient having received both types of total knee arthroplasties. Invited patients did three exercises with each of their different knee replacements; extension against gravity, flexion against gravity, and a step-up. These exercises were recorded using video fluoroscopy, and a series of still digital images over the flexion range were retrieved. The relationship of patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle for each patient was derived. The patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle of the mobile-bearing knee behaved in a linear manner more closely replicating the normal knee, whereas the fixed-bearing knee behaved in a nonlinear, more variable manner. This pattern of results was similar for all three exercises with each patient having one knee replacement that behaved differently in the sagittal plane when compared with their other knee replacement. These kinematic differences may explain the clinical differences observed in the randomized controlled trials that compared these two total knee arthroplasties.",
author = "Rees, {J. L.} and Beard, {D. J.} and Price, {A. J.} and Gill, {H. S.} and P. McLardy-Smith and Dodd, {C. A.} and Murray, {D. W.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1097/01.blo.0000150372.92398.ba",
language = "English",
pages = "204--209",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "432",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties

AU - Rees, J. L.

AU - Beard, D. J.

AU - Price, A. J.

AU - Gill, H. S.

AU - McLardy-Smith, P.

AU - Dodd, C. A.

AU - Murray, D. W.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - We did an in vivo fluoroscopic study comparing the sagittal plane kinematics of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties in a unique group of patients. These patients were part of a larger bilateral randomized controlled outcome trial with each patient having received both types of total knee arthroplasties. Invited patients did three exercises with each of their different knee replacements; extension against gravity, flexion against gravity, and a step-up. These exercises were recorded using video fluoroscopy, and a series of still digital images over the flexion range were retrieved. The relationship of patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle for each patient was derived. The patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle of the mobile-bearing knee behaved in a linear manner more closely replicating the normal knee, whereas the fixed-bearing knee behaved in a nonlinear, more variable manner. This pattern of results was similar for all three exercises with each patient having one knee replacement that behaved differently in the sagittal plane when compared with their other knee replacement. These kinematic differences may explain the clinical differences observed in the randomized controlled trials that compared these two total knee arthroplasties.

AB - We did an in vivo fluoroscopic study comparing the sagittal plane kinematics of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties in a unique group of patients. These patients were part of a larger bilateral randomized controlled outcome trial with each patient having received both types of total knee arthroplasties. Invited patients did three exercises with each of their different knee replacements; extension against gravity, flexion against gravity, and a step-up. These exercises were recorded using video fluoroscopy, and a series of still digital images over the flexion range were retrieved. The relationship of patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle for each patient was derived. The patella tendon angle to knee flexion angle of the mobile-bearing knee behaved in a linear manner more closely replicating the normal knee, whereas the fixed-bearing knee behaved in a nonlinear, more variable manner. This pattern of results was similar for all three exercises with each patient having one knee replacement that behaved differently in the sagittal plane when compared with their other knee replacement. These kinematic differences may explain the clinical differences observed in the randomized controlled trials that compared these two total knee arthroplasties.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15738823

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000150372.92398.ba

U2 - 10.1097/01.blo.0000150372.92398.ba

DO - 10.1097/01.blo.0000150372.92398.ba

M3 - Article

SP - 204

EP - 209

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 432

ER -