Rationalizing the GMO debate: the ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths

Stefan Hielscher, Ingo Pies, Vladislav Valentinov, Lioudmila Chatalova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 9 Citations

Abstract

The public discourse on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is not only controversial, but also infused with highly emotional and moralizing rhetoric. Although the assessment of risks and benefits of GMOs must be a scientific exercise, many debates on this issue seem to remain impervious to scientific evidence. In many cases, the moral psychology attributes of the general public create incentives for both GMO opponents and proponents to pursue misleading public campaigns, which impede the comprehensive assessment of the full spectrum of the risks and benefits of GMOs. The ordonomic approach to economic ethics introduced in this research note is helpful for disentangling the socio-economic and moral components of the GMO debate by re- and deconstructing moral claims.

LanguageEnglish
Article number476
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatusPublished - 9 May 2016

Fingerprint

Genetically Modified Organisms
Economics
Ethics
Motivation
Psychology
Research

Keywords

  • Sustainability
  • Discourse
  • Ethics
  • GMO
  • Morality
  • Ordonomics
  • Agricultural myths

Cite this

Rationalizing the GMO debate : the ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths. / Hielscher, Stefan; Pies, Ingo; Valentinov, Vladislav; Chatalova, Lioudmila.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 13, No. 5, 476, 09.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c7de3a167604917982445bb0b7ac9fd,
title = "Rationalizing the GMO debate: the ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths",
abstract = "The public discourse on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is not only controversial, but also infused with highly emotional and moralizing rhetoric. Although the assessment of risks and benefits of GMOs must be a scientific exercise, many debates on this issue seem to remain impervious to scientific evidence. In many cases, the moral psychology attributes of the general public create incentives for both GMO opponents and proponents to pursue misleading public campaigns, which impede the comprehensive assessment of the full spectrum of the risks and benefits of GMOs. The ordonomic approach to economic ethics introduced in this research note is helpful for disentangling the socio-economic and moral components of the GMO debate by re- and deconstructing moral claims.",
keywords = "Sustainability, Discourse, Ethics, GMO, Morality, Ordonomics, Agricultural myths",
author = "Stefan Hielscher and Ingo Pies and Vladislav Valentinov and Lioudmila Chatalova",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "9",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph13050476",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1660-4601",
publisher = "Molecular Diversity Preservation International",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rationalizing the GMO debate

T2 - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

AU - Hielscher, Stefan

AU - Pies, Ingo

AU - Valentinov, Vladislav

AU - Chatalova, Lioudmila

PY - 2016/5/9

Y1 - 2016/5/9

N2 - The public discourse on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is not only controversial, but also infused with highly emotional and moralizing rhetoric. Although the assessment of risks and benefits of GMOs must be a scientific exercise, many debates on this issue seem to remain impervious to scientific evidence. In many cases, the moral psychology attributes of the general public create incentives for both GMO opponents and proponents to pursue misleading public campaigns, which impede the comprehensive assessment of the full spectrum of the risks and benefits of GMOs. The ordonomic approach to economic ethics introduced in this research note is helpful for disentangling the socio-economic and moral components of the GMO debate by re- and deconstructing moral claims.

AB - The public discourse on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is not only controversial, but also infused with highly emotional and moralizing rhetoric. Although the assessment of risks and benefits of GMOs must be a scientific exercise, many debates on this issue seem to remain impervious to scientific evidence. In many cases, the moral psychology attributes of the general public create incentives for both GMO opponents and proponents to pursue misleading public campaigns, which impede the comprehensive assessment of the full spectrum of the risks and benefits of GMOs. The ordonomic approach to economic ethics introduced in this research note is helpful for disentangling the socio-economic and moral components of the GMO debate by re- and deconstructing moral claims.

KW - Sustainability

KW - Discourse

KW - Ethics

KW - GMO

KW - Morality

KW - Ordonomics

KW - Agricultural myths

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966440490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050476

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph13050476

DO - 10.3390/ijerph13050476

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1660-4601

IS - 5

M1 - 476

ER -