Rationalising for and against a policy for school-led careers-guidance (SLCG) in STEM in the UK: A teacher perspective

Richard Watermeyer, Pat Morton, Jill Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This paper reports on teacher attitudes to changes in the provision of career guidance in the UK, particularly as it relates to STEM. It draws on survey data of n=94 secondary-school teachers operating in STEM domains and their attitudes towards a UK and devolved policy of internalising careers guidance within schools. The survey presents a mixed message of teachers recognising the significance of their unique position in providing learners with career guidance yet concern that their 'relational proximity' to students and 'informational distance' from higher education and STEM industry may produce bias and misinformation that is harmful to their educational and occupational futures.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1441-1458
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume38
Issue number9
Early online date21 Jun 2016
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

career guidance
school career
teacher
secondary school teacher
teacher attitude
industry
trend
school
education
student

Cite this

Rationalising for and against a policy for school-led careers-guidance (SLCG) in STEM in the UK : A teacher perspective. / Watermeyer, Richard; Morton, Pat; Collins, Jill.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2016, p. 1441-1458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5c5bd72e84a4233827e75ef9f026bd9,
title = "Rationalising for and against a policy for school-led careers-guidance (SLCG) in STEM in the UK: A teacher perspective",
abstract = "This paper reports on teacher attitudes to changes in the provision of career guidance in the UK, particularly as it relates to STEM. It draws on survey data of n=94 secondary-school teachers operating in STEM domains and their attitudes towards a UK and devolved policy of internalising careers guidance within schools. The survey presents a mixed message of teachers recognising the significance of their unique position in providing learners with career guidance yet concern that their 'relational proximity' to students and 'informational distance' from higher education and STEM industry may produce bias and misinformation that is harmful to their educational and occupational futures.",
author = "Richard Watermeyer and Pat Morton and Jill Collins",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2016.1195520",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1441--1458",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rationalising for and against a policy for school-led careers-guidance (SLCG) in STEM in the UK

T2 - International Journal of Science Education

AU - Watermeyer,Richard

AU - Morton,Pat

AU - Collins,Jill

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper reports on teacher attitudes to changes in the provision of career guidance in the UK, particularly as it relates to STEM. It draws on survey data of n=94 secondary-school teachers operating in STEM domains and their attitudes towards a UK and devolved policy of internalising careers guidance within schools. The survey presents a mixed message of teachers recognising the significance of their unique position in providing learners with career guidance yet concern that their 'relational proximity' to students and 'informational distance' from higher education and STEM industry may produce bias and misinformation that is harmful to their educational and occupational futures.

AB - This paper reports on teacher attitudes to changes in the provision of career guidance in the UK, particularly as it relates to STEM. It draws on survey data of n=94 secondary-school teachers operating in STEM domains and their attitudes towards a UK and devolved policy of internalising careers guidance within schools. The survey presents a mixed message of teachers recognising the significance of their unique position in providing learners with career guidance yet concern that their 'relational proximity' to students and 'informational distance' from higher education and STEM industry may produce bias and misinformation that is harmful to their educational and occupational futures.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1195520

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2016.1195520

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2016.1195520

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1441

EP - 1458

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 9

ER -