Abstract
We develop a model to illustrate potential complexities in the relationship between
corporate geographical diversification and the health and safety (H&S) standards set in national
jurisdictions. A firm, that initially has a plant in its home country, may choose to also have one or
two foreign plants in order to improve its bargaining position versus local governments, and so
ensure reduced H&S standards, i.e. a race-to-the-bottom. However, contrary to the main focus of
the popular debate on this topic, we note the potential for the race-to-the-bottom tendency to be
exerted on H&S standards in the multinational company’s home rather than host country, and
also for an upward push on H&S to instead result.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-311 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Economic and Social Review |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Sustainability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Race-to-the-bottom or -top at home or abroad: health and safety standards and the multinational firm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS