Rabbits protecting birds: Hypopredation and limitations of hyperpredation

Andrew Bate, Frank Hilker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biological invasions often damage island ecosystems. One such damaging consequence of biological invasions is hyperpredation. Hyperpredation is the increase in predation pressure from a generalist predator following the introduction of an alternative prey, typically a consequence of apparent competition between the two prey. Models for this have been devised that demonstrate this effect. However, hyperpredation may not always occur or may not always occur at the same strength. Here, we investigate how different mechanisms affect the magnitude of hyperpredation: (i) saturation of the predator's functional response, (ii) predator interference and (iii) non-predatory competition among predators. We find that all three mechanisms generally reduce hyperpredation. Predator saturation can actually overturn hyperpredation into hypopredation, an increase in native prey, as a result of apparent predation between the two prey. This occurs when the alternative prey is ‘poisoned prey’, i.e. prey that have a handling time cost greater than the nutritional benefit for the predator. Consuming ‘poisoned prey’ can result in an increase or decrease in predator density. Conversely, we also identify scenarios in which interference and competition may increase hyperpredation. Based on these insights, we conclude that the invasion of established ecosystems by non-native prey can lead to more diverse consequences than previously thought. Potential control measures should take these effects into account.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-115
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Theoretical Biology
Volume297
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Birds
Rabbit
Prey
Ecosystem
Predator
rabbits
Rabbits
predators
Ecosystems
birds
Islands
Invasion
Pressure
Costs and Cost Analysis
predation
Saturation
ecosystems
functional response models
Interference
Costs

Cite this

Rabbits protecting birds: Hypopredation and limitations of hyperpredation. / Bate, Andrew; Hilker, Frank.

In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 297, 21.04.2012, p. 103-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bate, Andrew ; Hilker, Frank. / Rabbits protecting birds: Hypopredation and limitations of hyperpredation. In: Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2012 ; Vol. 297. pp. 103-115.
@article{3d51c56522574752972a93f113d6def5,
title = "Rabbits protecting birds: Hypopredation and limitations of hyperpredation",
abstract = "Biological invasions often damage island ecosystems. One such damaging consequence of biological invasions is hyperpredation. Hyperpredation is the increase in predation pressure from a generalist predator following the introduction of an alternative prey, typically a consequence of apparent competition between the two prey. Models for this have been devised that demonstrate this effect. However, hyperpredation may not always occur or may not always occur at the same strength. Here, we investigate how different mechanisms affect the magnitude of hyperpredation: (i) saturation of the predator's functional response, (ii) predator interference and (iii) non-predatory competition among predators. We find that all three mechanisms generally reduce hyperpredation. Predator saturation can actually overturn hyperpredation into hypopredation, an increase in native prey, as a result of apparent predation between the two prey. This occurs when the alternative prey is ‘poisoned prey’, i.e. prey that have a handling time cost greater than the nutritional benefit for the predator. Consuming ‘poisoned prey’ can result in an increase or decrease in predator density. Conversely, we also identify scenarios in which interference and competition may increase hyperpredation. Based on these insights, we conclude that the invasion of established ecosystems by non-native prey can lead to more diverse consequences than previously thought. Potential control measures should take these effects into account.",
author = "Andrew Bate and Frank Hilker",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.005",
language = "English",
volume = "297",
pages = "103--115",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical Biology",
issn = "0022-5193",
publisher = "Elsevier Academic Press Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rabbits protecting birds: Hypopredation and limitations of hyperpredation

AU - Bate, Andrew

AU - Hilker, Frank

PY - 2012/4/21

Y1 - 2012/4/21

N2 - Biological invasions often damage island ecosystems. One such damaging consequence of biological invasions is hyperpredation. Hyperpredation is the increase in predation pressure from a generalist predator following the introduction of an alternative prey, typically a consequence of apparent competition between the two prey. Models for this have been devised that demonstrate this effect. However, hyperpredation may not always occur or may not always occur at the same strength. Here, we investigate how different mechanisms affect the magnitude of hyperpredation: (i) saturation of the predator's functional response, (ii) predator interference and (iii) non-predatory competition among predators. We find that all three mechanisms generally reduce hyperpredation. Predator saturation can actually overturn hyperpredation into hypopredation, an increase in native prey, as a result of apparent predation between the two prey. This occurs when the alternative prey is ‘poisoned prey’, i.e. prey that have a handling time cost greater than the nutritional benefit for the predator. Consuming ‘poisoned prey’ can result in an increase or decrease in predator density. Conversely, we also identify scenarios in which interference and competition may increase hyperpredation. Based on these insights, we conclude that the invasion of established ecosystems by non-native prey can lead to more diverse consequences than previously thought. Potential control measures should take these effects into account.

AB - Biological invasions often damage island ecosystems. One such damaging consequence of biological invasions is hyperpredation. Hyperpredation is the increase in predation pressure from a generalist predator following the introduction of an alternative prey, typically a consequence of apparent competition between the two prey. Models for this have been devised that demonstrate this effect. However, hyperpredation may not always occur or may not always occur at the same strength. Here, we investigate how different mechanisms affect the magnitude of hyperpredation: (i) saturation of the predator's functional response, (ii) predator interference and (iii) non-predatory competition among predators. We find that all three mechanisms generally reduce hyperpredation. Predator saturation can actually overturn hyperpredation into hypopredation, an increase in native prey, as a result of apparent predation between the two prey. This occurs when the alternative prey is ‘poisoned prey’, i.e. prey that have a handling time cost greater than the nutritional benefit for the predator. Consuming ‘poisoned prey’ can result in an increase or decrease in predator density. Conversely, we also identify scenarios in which interference and competition may increase hyperpredation. Based on these insights, we conclude that the invasion of established ecosystems by non-native prey can lead to more diverse consequences than previously thought. Potential control measures should take these effects into account.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855275510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.005

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.005

M3 - Article

VL - 297

SP - 103

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology

JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology

SN - 0022-5193

ER -