Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses: A Policy Makers Guide

Paul Ashwin, Monica McLean, Andrea Abbas

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Abstract

Summary of Main Findings
‘The Pedagogic Quality and Inequality in University First
Degrees Project’ was a longitudinal investigation of sociology and related social science degree courses in four universities see Appendix I for an outline). Its main objectives were to investigate what social science students value about their University education and differences in curriculum and teaching in different universities. The main findings are summarised
below and relate to defining, improving and measuring the quality of undergraduate courses.
Defining good quality undergraduate courses
• High quality undergraduate courses are those in which
students engage with academic knowledge in transformative ways. Courses in different disciplines are likely to be transformative in different ways.
• In sociology-related social sciences, academic engagement is transformative in three ways: students gain access to an understanding of academic knowledge that is interesting and relevant to their lives; it changes the way that they understand themselves and their place in the world; and they gain an enhanced understanding of society. Such outcomes emphasise the importance of maintaining sociology-related social science courses across the sector.
• Good teaching is vital if students are to engage with
academic knowledge in transformative ways.
Improving the quality of undergraduate courses
• Improving teaching is central to improving the quality of
undergraduate courses.
• Good teaching is multidimensional and improving it is time consuming and challenging.
• A focus on quality enhancement that supports lecturers is in danger of being obscured by the emphasis in recent policy documents on improving quality through competition.
Measuring the quality of undergraduate courses
• Key measures of the quality of undergraduate courses are students’ engagement with academic knowledge and
good teaching.
• When quality is measured by engagement with academic
knowledge, the ranking of the universities in the study is very different from that in national higher education league tables.
• Without engaging meaningfully in academic knowledge,
students are unlikely to gain much benefit from studying an undergraduate degree. So in order to be valid measures of the quality of undergraduate courses, national higher education league tables, Key Information Sets and the National Student Survey need to take account of students’ engagement with academic knowledge.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of Nottingham
Number of pages10
StatusPublished - 1 Jun 2012

Fingerprint

student
social science
Teaching
sociology
university
university education
pedagogics
ranking
education
university teacher
curriculum
Values

Keywords

  • Undergraduate Degrees
  • Quality
  • Curricula
  • Pedagogy
  • Sociology Degrees

Cite this

Ashwin, P., McLean, M., & Abbas, A. (2012). Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses: A Policy Makers Guide. University of Nottingham.

Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses : A Policy Makers Guide. / Ashwin, Paul; McLean, Monica ; Abbas, Andrea.

University of Nottingham, 2012. 10 p.

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Ashwin, P, McLean, M & Abbas, A 2012, Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses: A Policy Makers Guide. University of Nottingham.
Ashwin P, McLean M, Abbas A. Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses: A Policy Makers Guide. University of Nottingham, 2012. 10 p.
Ashwin, Paul ; McLean, Monica ; Abbas, Andrea. / Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses : A Policy Makers Guide. University of Nottingham, 2012. 10 p.
@book{5f6fe9c10b8749c8a17d89289efb35c9,
title = "Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses: A Policy Makers Guide",
abstract = "Summary of Main Findings‘The Pedagogic Quality and Inequality in University FirstDegrees Project’ was a longitudinal investigation of sociology and related social science degree courses in four universities see Appendix I for an outline). Its main objectives were to investigate what social science students value about their University education and differences in curriculum and teaching in different universities. The main findings are summarisedbelow and relate to defining, improving and measuring the quality of undergraduate courses.Defining good quality undergraduate courses• High quality undergraduate courses are those in whichstudents engage with academic knowledge in transformative ways. Courses in different disciplines are likely to be transformative in different ways.• In sociology-related social sciences, academic engagement is transformative in three ways: students gain access to an understanding of academic knowledge that is interesting and relevant to their lives; it changes the way that they understand themselves and their place in the world; and they gain an enhanced understanding of society. Such outcomes emphasise the importance of maintaining sociology-related social science courses across the sector.• Good teaching is vital if students are to engage withacademic knowledge in transformative ways.Improving the quality of undergraduate courses• Improving teaching is central to improving the quality ofundergraduate courses.• Good teaching is multidimensional and improving it is time consuming and challenging.• A focus on quality enhancement that supports lecturers is in danger of being obscured by the emphasis in recent policy documents on improving quality through competition.Measuring the quality of undergraduate courses• Key measures of the quality of undergraduate courses are students’ engagement with academic knowledge andgood teaching.• When quality is measured by engagement with academicknowledge, the ranking of the universities in the study is very different from that in national higher education league tables.• Without engaging meaningfully in academic knowledge,students are unlikely to gain much benefit from studying an undergraduate degree. So in order to be valid measures of the quality of undergraduate courses, national higher education league tables, Key Information Sets and the National Student Survey need to take account of students’ engagement with academic knowledge.",
keywords = "Undergraduate Degrees, Quality, Curricula, Pedagogy, Sociology Degrees",
author = "Paul Ashwin and Monica McLean and Andrea Abbas",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
publisher = "University of Nottingham",
address = "UK United Kingdom",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses

T2 - A Policy Makers Guide

AU - Ashwin, Paul

AU - McLean, Monica

AU - Abbas, Andrea

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Summary of Main Findings‘The Pedagogic Quality and Inequality in University FirstDegrees Project’ was a longitudinal investigation of sociology and related social science degree courses in four universities see Appendix I for an outline). Its main objectives were to investigate what social science students value about their University education and differences in curriculum and teaching in different universities. The main findings are summarisedbelow and relate to defining, improving and measuring the quality of undergraduate courses.Defining good quality undergraduate courses• High quality undergraduate courses are those in whichstudents engage with academic knowledge in transformative ways. Courses in different disciplines are likely to be transformative in different ways.• In sociology-related social sciences, academic engagement is transformative in three ways: students gain access to an understanding of academic knowledge that is interesting and relevant to their lives; it changes the way that they understand themselves and their place in the world; and they gain an enhanced understanding of society. Such outcomes emphasise the importance of maintaining sociology-related social science courses across the sector.• Good teaching is vital if students are to engage withacademic knowledge in transformative ways.Improving the quality of undergraduate courses• Improving teaching is central to improving the quality ofundergraduate courses.• Good teaching is multidimensional and improving it is time consuming and challenging.• A focus on quality enhancement that supports lecturers is in danger of being obscured by the emphasis in recent policy documents on improving quality through competition.Measuring the quality of undergraduate courses• Key measures of the quality of undergraduate courses are students’ engagement with academic knowledge andgood teaching.• When quality is measured by engagement with academicknowledge, the ranking of the universities in the study is very different from that in national higher education league tables.• Without engaging meaningfully in academic knowledge,students are unlikely to gain much benefit from studying an undergraduate degree. So in order to be valid measures of the quality of undergraduate courses, national higher education league tables, Key Information Sets and the National Student Survey need to take account of students’ engagement with academic knowledge.

AB - Summary of Main Findings‘The Pedagogic Quality and Inequality in University FirstDegrees Project’ was a longitudinal investigation of sociology and related social science degree courses in four universities see Appendix I for an outline). Its main objectives were to investigate what social science students value about their University education and differences in curriculum and teaching in different universities. The main findings are summarisedbelow and relate to defining, improving and measuring the quality of undergraduate courses.Defining good quality undergraduate courses• High quality undergraduate courses are those in whichstudents engage with academic knowledge in transformative ways. Courses in different disciplines are likely to be transformative in different ways.• In sociology-related social sciences, academic engagement is transformative in three ways: students gain access to an understanding of academic knowledge that is interesting and relevant to their lives; it changes the way that they understand themselves and their place in the world; and they gain an enhanced understanding of society. Such outcomes emphasise the importance of maintaining sociology-related social science courses across the sector.• Good teaching is vital if students are to engage withacademic knowledge in transformative ways.Improving the quality of undergraduate courses• Improving teaching is central to improving the quality ofundergraduate courses.• Good teaching is multidimensional and improving it is time consuming and challenging.• A focus on quality enhancement that supports lecturers is in danger of being obscured by the emphasis in recent policy documents on improving quality through competition.Measuring the quality of undergraduate courses• Key measures of the quality of undergraduate courses are students’ engagement with academic knowledge andgood teaching.• When quality is measured by engagement with academicknowledge, the ranking of the universities in the study is very different from that in national higher education league tables.• Without engaging meaningfully in academic knowledge,students are unlikely to gain much benefit from studying an undergraduate degree. So in order to be valid measures of the quality of undergraduate courses, national higher education league tables, Key Information Sets and the National Student Survey need to take account of students’ engagement with academic knowledge.

KW - Undergraduate Degrees

KW - Quality

KW - Curricula

KW - Pedagogy

KW - Sociology Degrees

M3 - Other report

BT - Quality and Inequality in Undergraduate Courses

PB - University of Nottingham

ER -