Qualitative research and the evaluation of development impact

incorporating authenticity into the assessment of rigour

Susan Johnson, Saltanat Rasulova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Renewed attention is being paid to the quality of qualitative research in studies of development impact in the wake of intense debate over the role of randomised control trials. These debates raised the bar over quality while also provoking concerns about whose voices matter and the politics of evidence-based policy making. This paper argues that both of these issues can be addressed through Guba and Lincoln’s trustworthiness criteria, and particularly the principle of authenticity which was developed to respond to demands for research to be transformative and emancipatory. Adopting these criteria in commissioned evaluations as checklist ‘artefacts’ are a means to improve rigour and raise ethical standards.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-276
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Development Effectiveness
Volume9
Issue number2
Early online date12 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

authenticity
qualitative research
trustworthiness
evaluation
policy making
artifact
politics
evidence
trial
demand

Cite this

Qualitative research and the evaluation of development impact : incorporating authenticity into the assessment of rigour. / Johnson, Susan; Rasulova, Saltanat.

In: Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2017, p. 263-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79cf1e698b034a2698d98f6da324cf4e,
title = "Qualitative research and the evaluation of development impact: incorporating authenticity into the assessment of rigour",
abstract = "Renewed attention is being paid to the quality of qualitative research in studies of development impact in the wake of intense debate over the role of randomised control trials. These debates raised the bar over quality while also provoking concerns about whose voices matter and the politics of evidence-based policy making. This paper argues that both of these issues can be addressed through Guba and Lincoln’s trustworthiness criteria, and particularly the principle of authenticity which was developed to respond to demands for research to be transformative and emancipatory. Adopting these criteria in commissioned evaluations as checklist ‘artefacts’ are a means to improve rigour and raise ethical standards.",
author = "Susan Johnson and Saltanat Rasulova",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/19439342.2017.1306577",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "263--276",
journal = "Journal of Development Effectiveness",
issn = "1943-9342",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative research and the evaluation of development impact

T2 - incorporating authenticity into the assessment of rigour

AU - Johnson, Susan

AU - Rasulova, Saltanat

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Renewed attention is being paid to the quality of qualitative research in studies of development impact in the wake of intense debate over the role of randomised control trials. These debates raised the bar over quality while also provoking concerns about whose voices matter and the politics of evidence-based policy making. This paper argues that both of these issues can be addressed through Guba and Lincoln’s trustworthiness criteria, and particularly the principle of authenticity which was developed to respond to demands for research to be transformative and emancipatory. Adopting these criteria in commissioned evaluations as checklist ‘artefacts’ are a means to improve rigour and raise ethical standards.

AB - Renewed attention is being paid to the quality of qualitative research in studies of development impact in the wake of intense debate over the role of randomised control trials. These debates raised the bar over quality while also provoking concerns about whose voices matter and the politics of evidence-based policy making. This paper argues that both of these issues can be addressed through Guba and Lincoln’s trustworthiness criteria, and particularly the principle of authenticity which was developed to respond to demands for research to be transformative and emancipatory. Adopting these criteria in commissioned evaluations as checklist ‘artefacts’ are a means to improve rigour and raise ethical standards.

U2 - 10.1080/19439342.2017.1306577

DO - 10.1080/19439342.2017.1306577

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 263

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Development Effectiveness

JF - Journal of Development Effectiveness

SN - 1943-9342

IS - 2

ER -