Abstract
More than half a century's worth of generalisations about the confidants in Racine's plays have led to a situation in which they are denied any characteristics as individuals. Some, however, are invested by the playwright with more than just a function. An examination of Pylade, 'ami d'Oreste' in Andromaque, shows that critics' responses to the role have varied between the nugatory and the inconsistent. In fact, in Pylade, Racine has created a confidant who has both a rounded character of his own and a palpable effect on the action of the play. The re-assessment of Racine outside the straitjacketed approach of the late twentieth century is at last beginning, and Racine's confidants can and should be re-evaluated and differentiated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 90-101 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Seventeenth-Century French Studies |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pylade, ami d'oreste, and the critics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS