Abstract
Industrial relations research that attempts to grapple with individuals’ union-related sentiments and activities often draws on one of two traditions of psychological research—the individual-level factors tradition (for example, personality and attitude-behaviour relations) and the social context tradition (for example, frustration-aggression and relative deprivation). This paper provides an overview of research conducted from within these traditions to explain union-related phenomena and identifies some of the limitations that arise as a consequence of a shared tendency to treat people in an atomistic fashion. The paper argues for an understanding of the psychological processes that underpin group-based action. To this end, it elaborates a theoretical framework based on social identity theory and self-categorisation theory that would allow us to examine the dynamic interplay between the individual, their cognitions and their environment. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of a specific case of union mobilisation, to indicate how this theoretical framework might aid empirical analysis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 485-504 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Industrial Relations |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2003 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Industrial relations