Abstract
The pure shear responses of Ti6Al4V alloy and Ti3Al2.5V alloy, conceived for unique applications in jet engine components, are compared using Digital Image Correlation technique from quasi-static (10−3/s), medium strain rate (101/s) and high strain rates (103/s). A series of bespoke torsion tests have been performed on a screw driven mechanical system, a fast hydraulic Instron machine and a Campbell split Hopkinson torsion bar, equipped with high speed photographic equipment. Observations have provided the strain rate dependence and the relation of pure shear failure at quasi-static and high strain rates. The quasi-static shear constitutive relationships including shear modulus, yield stress and failure strain of both alloys are compared at the location of failure initiation, using a bespoke four camera system. The Ti3Al2.5V alloy presents lower shear flow stress and strain rate sensitivity with higher ductility, as opposed to the Ti6Al4V alloy with limited plastic deformation capacity. Associated with modest estimated overall temperature rise until final collapse of the specimen, both ductile Ti3Al2.5V alloy and brittle Ti6Al4V alloy fail by adiabatic shear banding at high strain rates. This is different from the void growth induced failure at medium strain rate with mild temperature rise and at quasi-isothermal condition. The present results show a general description of brittle and ductile alloys in engineering design. Likewise, this study will guide the characterization of pure shear flow and failure for current and future developed impact resistant alloys.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 104262 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Mechanics of Materials |
Volume | 167 |
Early online date | 16 Feb 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
Funding
The authors thank Mr. J. Fullerton, Dr. M. Rutherford, Mr. S. Carter, Mrs. K. Bamford and Dr. K. Dragnevski for their assistance. We thank Dr. DAS. Macdoguall and Dr. J. Reed from Rolls-Royce plc for the continuous support in the development of torsion technique, and the discussion about thermomechanics. Prof. D. Rittel and Dr. A. Dorogoy at the Technion are acknowledged for the guidance of the SCS technique. Critical comments and fruitful suggestions from Dr. S. Walley at The Cavendish Laboratory about the physics of torsion are greatly appreciated.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Rolls Royce | |
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology |
Keywords
- Constitutive behavior
- Hopkinson bar
- Pure shear
- Strain localization
- Titanium alloys
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Materials Science
- Instrumentation
- Mechanics of Materials