Publication bias in waders

G H Thomas, Tamas Szekely, W J Sutherland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Why are some waders better studied than others? We investigated the effects of life-history and ecological traits (population size, conservation status, body mass, wing length, breeding latitude, mating system, and migratory behaviour) on the number of publications in waders. A phylogenetic comparative approach is employed using an unpublished wader supertree. Overall, population size appears to be the most useful predictor of citation. The presence of publication bias may impact upon comparative and meta-analyses. The trend towards studies of taxa with large populations indicates that taxa at risk of local or global extinction may be understudied.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-223
Number of pages8
JournalWader Study Group Bulletin
Volume100
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Publication bias in waders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Thomas, G. H., Szekely, T., & Sutherland, W. J. (2003). Publication bias in waders. Wader Study Group Bulletin, 100, 216-223.