Abstract
In the UK there are strong policy imperatives to transition toward low carbon energy systems but how and in what ways such transitional processes might be realised remains highly uncertain. One key area of uncertainty pertains to public attitudes and acceptability. Though there is wide-ranging research relevant to public acceptability, very little work has unpacked the multiple questions concerning how policy-makers can grapple with and mitigate related uncertainties in efforts to enact energy systems change. In this paper, public acceptability is identified as an indeterminate form of uncertainty that presents particular challenges for policy making. We build on our existing research into public values for energy system change to explore how the outcomes of the project can be applied in thinking through the uncertainties associated with public acceptability. Notably, we illustrate how the public values identified through our research bring into view alternative and quite different problem and solution framings to those currently evident within UK policy. We argue that engagement with a wide range of different framings can offer a basis for better understanding and anticipating public responses to energy system change, ultimately aiding in managing the complex set of uncertainties associated with public acceptability.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 665-672 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Energy Policy |
Volume | 87 |
Early online date | 25 Oct 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Dec 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research formed part of the programme of the UK Energy Research Centre and was supported by the UK Research Councils under the Natural Environment Research Council award NE/G007748/1 (grant NE/I006753/1 ). Additional support was provided by the Leverhulme Trust ( F/00407/AG ). The authors would like to thank Jim Watson, Ioanna Ketsopoulou, and Jillian Anable for their comments on earlier drafts, two anonymous reviewers, and all of the research participants. We also thank Brian Drysdale, Merryn Thomas, and Kate Walker who assisted with the research and our advisory panel, as well as Jim Skea, Peter Pearson, Nick Jenkins, Tracy Sweet, Lorraine Whitmarsh, and the staff at the UK Energy Research Centre. Ruth Curran and Jan Kiso of the 2050 team at the Department of Energy and Climate Change and staff at Delib assisted with our use of the my2050 tool.
Keywords
- Energy policy
- Energy transitions
- Public acceptability
- Uncertainty
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Energy
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law