Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change

Findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project

Clive E. Sabel, Rosemary Hiscock, Arja Asikainen, Jun Bi, Mike Depledge, Sef Van Den Elshout, Rainer Friedrich, Ganlin Huang, Fintan Hurley, Matti Jantunen, Spyros P. Karakitsios, Menno Keuken, Simon Kingham, Periklis Kontoroupis, Nino Kuenzli, Miaomiao Liu, Marco Martuzzi, Katie Morton, Pierpaolo Mudu, Marjo Niittynen & 6 others Laura Perez, Denis Sarigiannis, Will Stahl-timmins, Myriam Tobollik, Jouni Tuomisto, Saskia Willers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Climate change is a global threat to health and wellbeing. Here we provide findings of an international research project investigating the health and wellbeing impacts of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in urban environments. Methods: Five European and two Chinese city authorities and partner academic organisations formed the project consortium. The methodology involved modelling the impact of adopted urban climate-change mitigation transport, buildings and energy policy scenarios, usually for the year 2020 and comparing them with business as usual (BAU) scenarios (where policies had not been adopted). Carbon dioxide emissions, health impacting exposures (air pollution, noise and physical activity), health (cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and leukaemia) and wellbeing (including noise related wellbeing, overall wellbeing, economic wellbeing and inequalities) were modelled. The scenarios were developed from corresponding known levels in 2010 and pre-existing exposure response functions. Additionally there were literature reviews, three longitudinal observational studies and two cross sectional surveys. Results: There are four key findings. Firstly introduction of electric cars may confer some small health benefits but it would be unwise for a city to invest in electric vehicles unless their power generation fuel mix generates fewer emissions than petrol and diesel. Second, adopting policies to reduce private car use may have benefits for carbon dioxide reduction and positive health impacts through reduced noise and increased physical activity. Third, the benefits of carbon dioxide reduction from increasing housing efficiency are likely to be minor and co-benefits for health and wellbeing are dependent on good air exchange. Fourthly, although heating dwellings by in-home biomass burning may reduce carbon dioxide emissions, consequences for health and wellbeing were negative with the technology in use in the cities studied.Conclusions: The climate-change reduction policies reduced CO2 emissions (the most common greenhouse gas) from cities but impact on global emissions of CO2 would be more limited due to some displacement of emissions. The health and wellbeing impacts varied and were often limited reflecting existing relatively high quality of life and environmental standards in most of the participating cities; the greatest potential for future health benefit occurs in less developed or developing countries.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberS25
JournalEnvironmental Health
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Climate Change
China
Public Health
Carbon Dioxide
Health
Insurance Benefits
Noise
Developing Countries
Gases
Air Pollution
Biomass
Heating
Observational Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Leukemia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Air
Economics
Quality of Life
Organizations

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Buildings
  • China
  • Energy
  • Europe
  • Greenhouse gas emission reduction policies
  • Health
  • Transport
  • Urban
  • Wellbeing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change : Findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project. / Sabel, Clive E.; Hiscock, Rosemary; Asikainen, Arja; Bi, Jun; Depledge, Mike; Van Den Elshout, Sef; Friedrich, Rainer; Huang, Ganlin; Hurley, Fintan; Jantunen, Matti; Karakitsios, Spyros P.; Keuken, Menno; Kingham, Simon; Kontoroupis, Periklis; Kuenzli, Nino; Liu, Miaomiao; Martuzzi, Marco; Morton, Katie; Mudu, Pierpaolo; Niittynen, Marjo; Perez, Laura; Sarigiannis, Denis; Stahl-timmins, Will; Tobollik, Myriam; Tuomisto, Jouni; Willers, Saskia.

In: Environmental Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, S25, 08.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sabel, CE, Hiscock, R, Asikainen, A, Bi, J, Depledge, M, Van Den Elshout, S, Friedrich, R, Huang, G, Hurley, F, Jantunen, M, Karakitsios, SP, Keuken, M, Kingham, S, Kontoroupis, P, Kuenzli, N, Liu, M, Martuzzi, M, Morton, K, Mudu, P, Niittynen, M, Perez, L, Sarigiannis, D, Stahl-timmins, W, Tobollik, M, Tuomisto, J & Willers, S 2016, 'Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change: Findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project', Environmental Health, vol. 15, no. 1, S25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0
Sabel, Clive E. ; Hiscock, Rosemary ; Asikainen, Arja ; Bi, Jun ; Depledge, Mike ; Van Den Elshout, Sef ; Friedrich, Rainer ; Huang, Ganlin ; Hurley, Fintan ; Jantunen, Matti ; Karakitsios, Spyros P. ; Keuken, Menno ; Kingham, Simon ; Kontoroupis, Periklis ; Kuenzli, Nino ; Liu, Miaomiao ; Martuzzi, Marco ; Morton, Katie ; Mudu, Pierpaolo ; Niittynen, Marjo ; Perez, Laura ; Sarigiannis, Denis ; Stahl-timmins, Will ; Tobollik, Myriam ; Tuomisto, Jouni ; Willers, Saskia. / Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change : Findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project. In: Environmental Health. 2016 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{7f20bb89beab4c26948a6f01b5e19d45,
title = "Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change: Findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project",
abstract = "Background: Climate change is a global threat to health and wellbeing. Here we provide findings of an international research project investigating the health and wellbeing impacts of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in urban environments. Methods: Five European and two Chinese city authorities and partner academic organisations formed the project consortium. The methodology involved modelling the impact of adopted urban climate-change mitigation transport, buildings and energy policy scenarios, usually for the year 2020 and comparing them with business as usual (BAU) scenarios (where policies had not been adopted). Carbon dioxide emissions, health impacting exposures (air pollution, noise and physical activity), health (cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and leukaemia) and wellbeing (including noise related wellbeing, overall wellbeing, economic wellbeing and inequalities) were modelled. The scenarios were developed from corresponding known levels in 2010 and pre-existing exposure response functions. Additionally there were literature reviews, three longitudinal observational studies and two cross sectional surveys. Results: There are four key findings. Firstly introduction of electric cars may confer some small health benefits but it would be unwise for a city to invest in electric vehicles unless their power generation fuel mix generates fewer emissions than petrol and diesel. Second, adopting policies to reduce private car use may have benefits for carbon dioxide reduction and positive health impacts through reduced noise and increased physical activity. Third, the benefits of carbon dioxide reduction from increasing housing efficiency are likely to be minor and co-benefits for health and wellbeing are dependent on good air exchange. Fourthly, although heating dwellings by in-home biomass burning may reduce carbon dioxide emissions, consequences for health and wellbeing were negative with the technology in use in the cities studied.Conclusions: The climate-change reduction policies reduced CO2 emissions (the most common greenhouse gas) from cities but impact on global emissions of CO2 would be more limited due to some displacement of emissions. The health and wellbeing impacts varied and were often limited reflecting existing relatively high quality of life and environmental standards in most of the participating cities; the greatest potential for future health benefit occurs in less developed or developing countries.",
keywords = "Air pollution, Buildings, China, Energy, Europe, Greenhouse gas emission reduction policies, Health, Transport, Urban, Wellbeing",
author = "Sabel, {Clive E.} and Rosemary Hiscock and Arja Asikainen and Jun Bi and Mike Depledge and {Van Den Elshout}, Sef and Rainer Friedrich and Ganlin Huang and Fintan Hurley and Matti Jantunen and Karakitsios, {Spyros P.} and Menno Keuken and Simon Kingham and Periklis Kontoroupis and Nino Kuenzli and Miaomiao Liu and Marco Martuzzi and Katie Morton and Pierpaolo Mudu and Marjo Niittynen and Laura Perez and Denis Sarigiannis and Will Stahl-timmins and Myriam Tobollik and Jouni Tuomisto and Saskia Willers",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Environmental Health",
issn = "1476-069X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change

T2 - Findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project

AU - Sabel, Clive E.

AU - Hiscock, Rosemary

AU - Asikainen, Arja

AU - Bi, Jun

AU - Depledge, Mike

AU - Van Den Elshout, Sef

AU - Friedrich, Rainer

AU - Huang, Ganlin

AU - Hurley, Fintan

AU - Jantunen, Matti

AU - Karakitsios, Spyros P.

AU - Keuken, Menno

AU - Kingham, Simon

AU - Kontoroupis, Periklis

AU - Kuenzli, Nino

AU - Liu, Miaomiao

AU - Martuzzi, Marco

AU - Morton, Katie

AU - Mudu, Pierpaolo

AU - Niittynen, Marjo

AU - Perez, Laura

AU - Sarigiannis, Denis

AU - Stahl-timmins, Will

AU - Tobollik, Myriam

AU - Tuomisto, Jouni

AU - Willers, Saskia

PY - 2016/3/8

Y1 - 2016/3/8

N2 - Background: Climate change is a global threat to health and wellbeing. Here we provide findings of an international research project investigating the health and wellbeing impacts of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in urban environments. Methods: Five European and two Chinese city authorities and partner academic organisations formed the project consortium. The methodology involved modelling the impact of adopted urban climate-change mitigation transport, buildings and energy policy scenarios, usually for the year 2020 and comparing them with business as usual (BAU) scenarios (where policies had not been adopted). Carbon dioxide emissions, health impacting exposures (air pollution, noise and physical activity), health (cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and leukaemia) and wellbeing (including noise related wellbeing, overall wellbeing, economic wellbeing and inequalities) were modelled. The scenarios were developed from corresponding known levels in 2010 and pre-existing exposure response functions. Additionally there were literature reviews, three longitudinal observational studies and two cross sectional surveys. Results: There are four key findings. Firstly introduction of electric cars may confer some small health benefits but it would be unwise for a city to invest in electric vehicles unless their power generation fuel mix generates fewer emissions than petrol and diesel. Second, adopting policies to reduce private car use may have benefits for carbon dioxide reduction and positive health impacts through reduced noise and increased physical activity. Third, the benefits of carbon dioxide reduction from increasing housing efficiency are likely to be minor and co-benefits for health and wellbeing are dependent on good air exchange. Fourthly, although heating dwellings by in-home biomass burning may reduce carbon dioxide emissions, consequences for health and wellbeing were negative with the technology in use in the cities studied.Conclusions: The climate-change reduction policies reduced CO2 emissions (the most common greenhouse gas) from cities but impact on global emissions of CO2 would be more limited due to some displacement of emissions. The health and wellbeing impacts varied and were often limited reflecting existing relatively high quality of life and environmental standards in most of the participating cities; the greatest potential for future health benefit occurs in less developed or developing countries.

AB - Background: Climate change is a global threat to health and wellbeing. Here we provide findings of an international research project investigating the health and wellbeing impacts of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in urban environments. Methods: Five European and two Chinese city authorities and partner academic organisations formed the project consortium. The methodology involved modelling the impact of adopted urban climate-change mitigation transport, buildings and energy policy scenarios, usually for the year 2020 and comparing them with business as usual (BAU) scenarios (where policies had not been adopted). Carbon dioxide emissions, health impacting exposures (air pollution, noise and physical activity), health (cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and leukaemia) and wellbeing (including noise related wellbeing, overall wellbeing, economic wellbeing and inequalities) were modelled. The scenarios were developed from corresponding known levels in 2010 and pre-existing exposure response functions. Additionally there were literature reviews, three longitudinal observational studies and two cross sectional surveys. Results: There are four key findings. Firstly introduction of electric cars may confer some small health benefits but it would be unwise for a city to invest in electric vehicles unless their power generation fuel mix generates fewer emissions than petrol and diesel. Second, adopting policies to reduce private car use may have benefits for carbon dioxide reduction and positive health impacts through reduced noise and increased physical activity. Third, the benefits of carbon dioxide reduction from increasing housing efficiency are likely to be minor and co-benefits for health and wellbeing are dependent on good air exchange. Fourthly, although heating dwellings by in-home biomass burning may reduce carbon dioxide emissions, consequences for health and wellbeing were negative with the technology in use in the cities studied.Conclusions: The climate-change reduction policies reduced CO2 emissions (the most common greenhouse gas) from cities but impact on global emissions of CO2 would be more limited due to some displacement of emissions. The health and wellbeing impacts varied and were often limited reflecting existing relatively high quality of life and environmental standards in most of the participating cities; the greatest potential for future health benefit occurs in less developed or developing countries.

KW - Air pollution

KW - Buildings

KW - China

KW - Energy

KW - Europe

KW - Greenhouse gas emission reduction policies

KW - Health

KW - Transport

KW - Urban

KW - Wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995695073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0

DO - 10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Environmental Health

JF - Environmental Health

SN - 1476-069X

IS - 1

M1 - S25

ER -