Public attitudes to GM foods. The balancing of risks and gains

John Hudson, Anetta Caplanova, Marcel Novak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the paper we study the variables influencing attitudes to the use of two biotechnologies related to gene transfer within apples. Using Eurobarometer 73.1 survey data on biotechnology, science and technology, with 15,650 respondents, we study the extent these attitudes are determined by socio-economic and other variables. We found that attitudes to the risks and gains are determined by socio-economic variables and also by the individual's knowledge, scientific background, their parent's education in science and their religion. Perceptions of naturalness and of environmental impact combined with perceived risks and gains in determining overall approval, proxied by views on whether the technologies should be encouraged, for GMTs. However there are substantial differences in attitudes to transgenesis and cisgenesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-313
Number of pages11
JournalAppetite
Volume92
Early online date27 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Food
Biotechnology
Religion and Science
Economics
Technology
Gene Transfer Techniques
Malus
Education
Genes
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Cisgenesis
  • Gene transfer
  • Genetically modified technologies
  • Scientific background
  • Transgenesis

Cite this

Public attitudes to GM foods. The balancing of risks and gains. / Hudson, John; Caplanova, Anetta; Novak, Marcel.

In: Appetite, Vol. 92, 01.09.2015, p. 303-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hudson, John ; Caplanova, Anetta ; Novak, Marcel. / Public attitudes to GM foods. The balancing of risks and gains. In: Appetite. 2015 ; Vol. 92. pp. 303-313.
@article{430c119010d142faa33f41ee653e03ec,
title = "Public attitudes to GM foods. The balancing of risks and gains",
abstract = "In the paper we study the variables influencing attitudes to the use of two biotechnologies related to gene transfer within apples. Using Eurobarometer 73.1 survey data on biotechnology, science and technology, with 15,650 respondents, we study the extent these attitudes are determined by socio-economic and other variables. We found that attitudes to the risks and gains are determined by socio-economic variables and also by the individual's knowledge, scientific background, their parent's education in science and their religion. Perceptions of naturalness and of environmental impact combined with perceived risks and gains in determining overall approval, proxied by views on whether the technologies should be encouraged, for GMTs. However there are substantial differences in attitudes to transgenesis and cisgenesis.",
keywords = "Cisgenesis, Gene transfer, Genetically modified technologies, Scientific background, Transgenesis",
author = "John Hudson and Anetta Caplanova and Marcel Novak",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.031",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "303--313",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Elsevier Academic Press Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public attitudes to GM foods. The balancing of risks and gains

AU - Hudson, John

AU - Caplanova, Anetta

AU - Novak, Marcel

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - In the paper we study the variables influencing attitudes to the use of two biotechnologies related to gene transfer within apples. Using Eurobarometer 73.1 survey data on biotechnology, science and technology, with 15,650 respondents, we study the extent these attitudes are determined by socio-economic and other variables. We found that attitudes to the risks and gains are determined by socio-economic variables and also by the individual's knowledge, scientific background, their parent's education in science and their religion. Perceptions of naturalness and of environmental impact combined with perceived risks and gains in determining overall approval, proxied by views on whether the technologies should be encouraged, for GMTs. However there are substantial differences in attitudes to transgenesis and cisgenesis.

AB - In the paper we study the variables influencing attitudes to the use of two biotechnologies related to gene transfer within apples. Using Eurobarometer 73.1 survey data on biotechnology, science and technology, with 15,650 respondents, we study the extent these attitudes are determined by socio-economic and other variables. We found that attitudes to the risks and gains are determined by socio-economic variables and also by the individual's knowledge, scientific background, their parent's education in science and their religion. Perceptions of naturalness and of environmental impact combined with perceived risks and gains in determining overall approval, proxied by views on whether the technologies should be encouraged, for GMTs. However there are substantial differences in attitudes to transgenesis and cisgenesis.

KW - Cisgenesis

KW - Gene transfer

KW - Genetically modified technologies

KW - Scientific background

KW - Transgenesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934971175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.031

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.031

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.031

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 303

EP - 313

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -