Psychological distress during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal survey of doctors practising in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and intensive care medicine in the UK and Ireland

Tom Roberts, Jo Daniels, William Hulme, Robert Hirst, Daniel Horner, Mark D. Lyttle, Katie Samuel, Blair Graham, Charlie Reynard, Michael Barrett, James Foley, John Cronin, Etimbuk Umana, Joao Vinagre, Edward Carlton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (SciVal)
134 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To quantify psychological distress experienced by emergency, anaesthetic and intensive care doctors during the acceleration phase of COVID-19 in the UK and Ireland. Methods: Initial cross-sectional electronic survey distributed during acceleration phase of the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 in the UK and Ireland (UK: 18 March 2020-26 March 2020 and Ireland: 25 March 2020-2 April 2020). Surveys were distributed via established specialty research networks, within a three-part longitudinal study. Participants were doctors working in emergency, anaesthetic and intensive medicine during the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 in acute hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Primary outcome measures were the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). Additional questions examined personal and professional characteristics, experiences of COVID-19 to date, risk to self and others and self-reported perceptions of health and well-being. Results: 5440 responses were obtained, 54.3% (n=2955) from emergency medicine and 36.9% (n=2005) from anaesthetics. All levels of doctor seniority were represented. For the primary outcome of GHQ-12 score, 44.2% (n=2405) of respondents scored >3, meeting the criteria for psychological distress. 57.3% (n=3045) had never previously provided clinical care during an infectious disease outbreak but over half of respondents felt somewhat prepared (48.6%, n=2653) or very prepared (7.6%, n=416) to provide clinical care to patients with COVID-19. However, 81.1% (n=4414) either agreed (31.1%, n=2709) or strongly agreed (31.1%, n=1705) that their personal health was at risk due to their clinical role. Conclusions: Findings indicate that during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of frontline doctors working in acute care reported psychological distress as measured by the GHQ-12. Findings from this study should inform strategies to optimise preparedness and explore modifiable factors associated with increased psychological distress in the short and long term. Trial registration number: ISRCTN10666798.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)450-459
Number of pages10
JournalEmergency medicine journal : EMJ
Volume2021
Issue number38
Early online date8 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • anaesthesia
  • emergency departments
  • intensive care
  • psychology
  • staff support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological distress during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal survey of doctors practising in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and intensive care medicine in the UK and Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this