Protocol for the Proactive Or Reactive Telephone Smoking CeSsation Support (PORTSSS) trial

T Coleman, A McEwen, Linda Bauld, Janet Ferguson, P Lorgelly, S Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Telephone quit lines are accessible to many smokers and are used to engage motivated smokers to make quit attempts. Smoking cessation counselling provided via telephone can either be reactive (i.e. primarily involving the provision of evidence-based information), or proactive (i.e. primarily involving repeated, sequenced calls from and interaction with trained cessation counsellors). Some studies have found proactive telephone counselling more effective and this trial will investigate whether or not proactive telephone support for smoking cessation, delivered through the National Health Service (NHS) Smoking Helpline is more effective or cost-effective than reactive support. It will also investigate whether or not providing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), in addition to telephone counselling, has an adjunctive impact on smoking cessation rates and whether or not this is cost effective. Methods: This will be a parallel group, factorial design RCT, conducted through the English national NHS Smoking Helpline which is run from headquarters in Glasgow. Participants will be smokers who call the helpline from any location in England and who wish to stop smoking. If 644 participants are recruited to four equally-sized trial groups (total sample size = 2576), the trial will have 90% power for detecting a treatment effect (Odds Ratio) of 1.5 for each of the two interventions: i) proactive versus reactive support and ii) the offer of NRT versus no offer. The primary outcome measure for the study is self-reported, prolonged abstinence from smoking for at least six months following an agreed quit date. A concurrent health economic evaluation will investigate the cost effectiveness of the two interventions when delivered via a telephone helpline. Discussion: The PORTSSS trial will provide high quality evidence to determine the most appropriate kind of counselling which should be provided via the NHS Smoking Helpline and also whether or not an additional offer of cost-free NRT is effective and cost effective for smoking cessation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number26
JournalTrials
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Smoking Cessation
Telephone
Smoking
Counseling
National Health Programs
Nicotine
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics
England
Sample Size
Odds Ratio
Health

Cite this

Coleman, T., McEwen, A., Bauld, L., Ferguson, J., Lorgelly, P., & Lewis, S. (2009). Protocol for the Proactive Or Reactive Telephone Smoking CeSsation Support (PORTSSS) trial. Trials, 10, [26]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-26

Protocol for the Proactive Or Reactive Telephone Smoking CeSsation Support (PORTSSS) trial. / Coleman, T; McEwen, A; Bauld, Linda; Ferguson, Janet; Lorgelly, P; Lewis, S.

In: Trials, Vol. 10, 26, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coleman, T, McEwen, A, Bauld, L, Ferguson, J, Lorgelly, P & Lewis, S 2009, 'Protocol for the Proactive Or Reactive Telephone Smoking CeSsation Support (PORTSSS) trial', Trials, vol. 10, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-26
Coleman, T ; McEwen, A ; Bauld, Linda ; Ferguson, Janet ; Lorgelly, P ; Lewis, S. / Protocol for the Proactive Or Reactive Telephone Smoking CeSsation Support (PORTSSS) trial. In: Trials. 2009 ; Vol. 10.
@article{c6753b5473d549bda65b774f9d1a9ec9,
title = "Protocol for the Proactive Or Reactive Telephone Smoking CeSsation Support (PORTSSS) trial",
abstract = "Background: Telephone quit lines are accessible to many smokers and are used to engage motivated smokers to make quit attempts. Smoking cessation counselling provided via telephone can either be reactive (i.e. primarily involving the provision of evidence-based information), or proactive (i.e. primarily involving repeated, sequenced calls from and interaction with trained cessation counsellors). Some studies have found proactive telephone counselling more effective and this trial will investigate whether or not proactive telephone support for smoking cessation, delivered through the National Health Service (NHS) Smoking Helpline is more effective or cost-effective than reactive support. It will also investigate whether or not providing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), in addition to telephone counselling, has an adjunctive impact on smoking cessation rates and whether or not this is cost effective. Methods: This will be a parallel group, factorial design RCT, conducted through the English national NHS Smoking Helpline which is run from headquarters in Glasgow. Participants will be smokers who call the helpline from any location in England and who wish to stop smoking. If 644 participants are recruited to four equally-sized trial groups (total sample size = 2576), the trial will have 90{\%} power for detecting a treatment effect (Odds Ratio) of 1.5 for each of the two interventions: i) proactive versus reactive support and ii) the offer of NRT versus no offer. The primary outcome measure for the study is self-reported, prolonged abstinence from smoking for at least six months following an agreed quit date. A concurrent health economic evaluation will investigate the cost effectiveness of the two interventions when delivered via a telephone helpline. Discussion: The PORTSSS trial will provide high quality evidence to determine the most appropriate kind of counselling which should be provided via the NHS Smoking Helpline and also whether or not an additional offer of cost-free NRT is effective and cost effective for smoking cessation.",
author = "T Coleman and A McEwen and Linda Bauld and Janet Ferguson and P Lorgelly and S Lewis",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-10-26",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protocol for the Proactive Or Reactive Telephone Smoking CeSsation Support (PORTSSS) trial

AU - Coleman, T

AU - McEwen, A

AU - Bauld, Linda

AU - Ferguson, Janet

AU - Lorgelly, P

AU - Lewis, S

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background: Telephone quit lines are accessible to many smokers and are used to engage motivated smokers to make quit attempts. Smoking cessation counselling provided via telephone can either be reactive (i.e. primarily involving the provision of evidence-based information), or proactive (i.e. primarily involving repeated, sequenced calls from and interaction with trained cessation counsellors). Some studies have found proactive telephone counselling more effective and this trial will investigate whether or not proactive telephone support for smoking cessation, delivered through the National Health Service (NHS) Smoking Helpline is more effective or cost-effective than reactive support. It will also investigate whether or not providing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), in addition to telephone counselling, has an adjunctive impact on smoking cessation rates and whether or not this is cost effective. Methods: This will be a parallel group, factorial design RCT, conducted through the English national NHS Smoking Helpline which is run from headquarters in Glasgow. Participants will be smokers who call the helpline from any location in England and who wish to stop smoking. If 644 participants are recruited to four equally-sized trial groups (total sample size = 2576), the trial will have 90% power for detecting a treatment effect (Odds Ratio) of 1.5 for each of the two interventions: i) proactive versus reactive support and ii) the offer of NRT versus no offer. The primary outcome measure for the study is self-reported, prolonged abstinence from smoking for at least six months following an agreed quit date. A concurrent health economic evaluation will investigate the cost effectiveness of the two interventions when delivered via a telephone helpline. Discussion: The PORTSSS trial will provide high quality evidence to determine the most appropriate kind of counselling which should be provided via the NHS Smoking Helpline and also whether or not an additional offer of cost-free NRT is effective and cost effective for smoking cessation.

AB - Background: Telephone quit lines are accessible to many smokers and are used to engage motivated smokers to make quit attempts. Smoking cessation counselling provided via telephone can either be reactive (i.e. primarily involving the provision of evidence-based information), or proactive (i.e. primarily involving repeated, sequenced calls from and interaction with trained cessation counsellors). Some studies have found proactive telephone counselling more effective and this trial will investigate whether or not proactive telephone support for smoking cessation, delivered through the National Health Service (NHS) Smoking Helpline is more effective or cost-effective than reactive support. It will also investigate whether or not providing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), in addition to telephone counselling, has an adjunctive impact on smoking cessation rates and whether or not this is cost effective. Methods: This will be a parallel group, factorial design RCT, conducted through the English national NHS Smoking Helpline which is run from headquarters in Glasgow. Participants will be smokers who call the helpline from any location in England and who wish to stop smoking. If 644 participants are recruited to four equally-sized trial groups (total sample size = 2576), the trial will have 90% power for detecting a treatment effect (Odds Ratio) of 1.5 for each of the two interventions: i) proactive versus reactive support and ii) the offer of NRT versus no offer. The primary outcome measure for the study is self-reported, prolonged abstinence from smoking for at least six months following an agreed quit date. A concurrent health economic evaluation will investigate the cost effectiveness of the two interventions when delivered via a telephone helpline. Discussion: The PORTSSS trial will provide high quality evidence to determine the most appropriate kind of counselling which should be provided via the NHS Smoking Helpline and also whether or not an additional offer of cost-free NRT is effective and cost effective for smoking cessation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65649148702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-26

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-10-26

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-10-26

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 26

ER -