PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches

James Lewis; Sarah Marsden; Adrian Cherney; Martine Zeuthen; Jocelyn J. Bélanger; Anastasiia Zubareva; Jürgen Brandsch; Mauro Lubrano

doi:10.1002/cl2.1301

PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches

James Lewis, Sarah Marsden, Adrian Cherney, Martine Zeuthen, Jocelyn J. Bélanger, Anastasiia Zubareva, Jürgen Brandsch, Mauro Lubrano

Politics, Languages & International Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an ‘overview of reviews’ that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.

Original language	English
Article number	e1301
Number of pages	35
Journal	Campbell Systematic Reviews
Volume	19
Issue number	1
Early online date	5 Feb 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1301
Publication status	Published - 31 Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This review is funded by a Campbell Collaboration grant awarded to Sarah Marsden via Public Safety Canada. The final review is due for submission to the Campbell Collaboration in 2023.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Social Sciences

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1002/cl2.1301Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{fb4c9571c00d48c3b519d1d0ae82c8a3,

title = "PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches",

abstract = "This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an {\textquoteleft}overview of reviews{\textquoteright} that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.",

author = "James Lewis and Sarah Marsden and Adrian Cherney and Martine Zeuthen and B{\'e}langer, {Jocelyn J.} and Anastasiia Zubareva and J{\"u}rgen Brandsch and Mauro Lubrano",

note = "Funding Information: This review is funded by a Campbell Collaboration grant awarded to Sarah Marsden via Public Safety Canada. The final review is due for submission to the Campbell Collaboration in 2023. ",

year = "2023",

month = mar,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1002/cl2.1301",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

journal = "Campbell Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1891-1803",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence

T2 - A systematic review of tools and approaches

AU - Lewis, James

AU - Marsden, Sarah

AU - Cherney, Adrian

AU - Zeuthen, Martine

AU - Bélanger, Jocelyn J.

AU - Zubareva, Anastasiia

AU - Brandsch, Jürgen

AU - Lubrano, Mauro

N1 - Funding Information: This review is funded by a Campbell Collaboration grant awarded to Sarah Marsden via Public Safety Canada. The final review is due for submission to the Campbell Collaboration in 2023.

PY - 2023/3/31

Y1 - 2023/3/31

N2 - This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an ‘overview of reviews’ that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.

AB - This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an ‘overview of reviews’ that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter-radicalisation practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150701377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cl2.1301

DO - 10.1002/cl2.1301

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85150701377

SN - 1891-1803

VL - 19

JO - Campbell Systematic Reviews

JF - Campbell Systematic Reviews

IS - 1

M1 - e1301

ER -

PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this