Abstract
‘Everyday nature’, understood as people’s ability to access nature nearby, should be protected in law and planning policy, facilitating three key benefits: (1) human health and wellbeing; (2) intrinsic and extrinsic ecological advantages; and (3) supporting the UK’s 30by30 nature conservation commitment. Yet there are three obstacles to the protection of everyday nature: (1) the prioritisation of ‘special’ and ‘priority’ nature conservation habitats; (2) the lack of protection for Local Wildlife Sites; as well as (3) counter-intuitively, the rise of biodiversity as a preferred governing concept. Addressing these obstacles, the paper develops the concept of everyday nature, making four proposals for change: (1) improved conceptual analysis; (2) confirming current policy on Local Wildlife Sites; (3) implementing the concept of everyday nature in legislation and planning policy; and (4) implementing the Government’s target that everyone lives within a 15-minute walk from a green or blue space.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | qae018 |
| Pages (from-to) | 275-299 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Law |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 22 Aug 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Nov 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- biodiversity
- everyday nature
- housing
- just transition
- nature
- nature conservation
- planning
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Protecting Everyday Nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS