Protecting Everyday Nature

Antonia Layard, Adam Marshall, Laura De Vito, Roger Few, Sophia Hatzisavvidou, Leslie Mabon, Odirilwe Selomane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

‘Everyday nature’, understood as people’s ability to access nature nearby, should be protected in law and planning policy, facilitating three key benefits: (1) human health and wellbeing; (2) intrinsic and extrinsic ecological advantages; and (3) supporting the UK’s 30by30 nature conservation commitment. Yet there are three obstacles to the protection of everyday nature: (1) the prioritisation of ‘special’ and ‘priority’ nature conservation habitats; (2) the lack of protection for Local Wildlife Sites; as well as (3) counter-intuitively, the rise of biodiversity as a preferred governing concept. Addressing these obstacles, the paper develops the concept of everyday nature, making four proposals for change: (1) improved conceptual analysis; (2) confirming current policy on Local Wildlife Sites; (3) implementing the concept of everyday nature in legislation and planning policy; and (4) implementing the Government’s target that everyone lives within a 15-minute walk from a green or blue space.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberqae018
Pages (from-to)275-299
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Environmental Law
Volume36
Issue number3
Early online date22 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2024

Keywords

  • biodiversity
  • everyday nature
  • housing
  • just transition
  • nature
  • nature conservation
  • planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Protecting Everyday Nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this