Projecting authenticity through advertising: consumer judgments of advertisers' claims

Michael B. Beverland, Adam Lindgreen, Michiel W. Vink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Authenticity is a cornerstone of contemporary marketing. Yet how do firms develop brand positions based on authenticity when marketing, and in particular, advertising, is believed to be antithetical to such positioning? We examine how consumers assess the claims of Trappist and Abbey beer brands. We identify three forms of authenticity: pure (literal) authenticity, approximate authenticity, and moral authenticity. In each case, consumers draw on either indexical or iconic cues to form judgments of authenticity, although the type of cue and degree of abstraction differ across the three types. We also find that the informants are duped by careful advertisements, and explain this by proposing that the relationships between indexical and iconic cues are closer than previously thought.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-15
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Advertising
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Projecting authenticity through advertising: consumer judgments of advertisers' claims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this