Productivity or Gender? The Impact of Domestic Tasks Across the Wage Distribution

Lynn Cooke, Jennifer Hook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article assesses the wage impact of domestic tasks across women's and men's wage distributions given the cross-distribution variation in unpaid work time. The productivity–volume versus the gender–class normative argument developed here suggests competing hypotheses. Analyses of pooled 2010–2015 waves of the American Time Use Survey using unconditional quantile regression revealed that an increase in the lesser time women at the top of the wage distribution spent doing routine housework predicted a smaller wage penalty than at the bottom of women's wage distribution. Conversely, men at the top of their wage distribution spent the least time doing routine tasks, but incurred the largest penalty for an increase in that time. Increases in nonroutine housework or child-care time did not negatively affect the wage distributions of women or most men. Results supported the volume–productivity argument for routine housework among women, but a gender–class normative argument for men.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)721-736
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Marriage and Family
Volume80
Issue number3
Early online date1 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2018

Fingerprint

wage
productivity
gender
housework
penalty
unpaid work
Productivity
Wages
time
regression
economics

Keywords

  • housework
  • income and earnings
  • unconditional quantile regression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Productivity or Gender? The Impact of Domestic Tasks Across the Wage Distribution. / Cooke, Lynn; Hook, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 80, No. 3, 08.05.2018, p. 721-736.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5cbcfef8d804e6480757da75bda05f3,
title = "Productivity or Gender? The Impact of Domestic Tasks Across the Wage Distribution",
abstract = "This article assesses the wage impact of domestic tasks across women's and men's wage distributions given the cross-distribution variation in unpaid work time. The productivity–volume versus the gender–class normative argument developed here suggests competing hypotheses. Analyses of pooled 2010–2015 waves of the American Time Use Survey using unconditional quantile regression revealed that an increase in the lesser time women at the top of the wage distribution spent doing routine housework predicted a smaller wage penalty than at the bottom of women's wage distribution. Conversely, men at the top of their wage distribution spent the least time doing routine tasks, but incurred the largest penalty for an increase in that time. Increases in nonroutine housework or child-care time did not negatively affect the wage distributions of women or most men. Results supported the volume–productivity argument for routine housework among women, but a gender–class normative argument for men.",
keywords = "housework, income and earnings, unconditional quantile regression",
author = "Lynn Cooke and Jennifer Hook",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1111/jomf.12467",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "721--736",
journal = "Journal of Marriage and Family",
issn = "0022-2445",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Productivity or Gender? The Impact of Domestic Tasks Across the Wage Distribution

AU - Cooke, Lynn

AU - Hook, Jennifer

PY - 2018/5/8

Y1 - 2018/5/8

N2 - This article assesses the wage impact of domestic tasks across women's and men's wage distributions given the cross-distribution variation in unpaid work time. The productivity–volume versus the gender–class normative argument developed here suggests competing hypotheses. Analyses of pooled 2010–2015 waves of the American Time Use Survey using unconditional quantile regression revealed that an increase in the lesser time women at the top of the wage distribution spent doing routine housework predicted a smaller wage penalty than at the bottom of women's wage distribution. Conversely, men at the top of their wage distribution spent the least time doing routine tasks, but incurred the largest penalty for an increase in that time. Increases in nonroutine housework or child-care time did not negatively affect the wage distributions of women or most men. Results supported the volume–productivity argument for routine housework among women, but a gender–class normative argument for men.

AB - This article assesses the wage impact of domestic tasks across women's and men's wage distributions given the cross-distribution variation in unpaid work time. The productivity–volume versus the gender–class normative argument developed here suggests competing hypotheses. Analyses of pooled 2010–2015 waves of the American Time Use Survey using unconditional quantile regression revealed that an increase in the lesser time women at the top of the wage distribution spent doing routine housework predicted a smaller wage penalty than at the bottom of women's wage distribution. Conversely, men at the top of their wage distribution spent the least time doing routine tasks, but incurred the largest penalty for an increase in that time. Increases in nonroutine housework or child-care time did not negatively affect the wage distributions of women or most men. Results supported the volume–productivity argument for routine housework among women, but a gender–class normative argument for men.

KW - housework

KW - income and earnings

KW - unconditional quantile regression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046763071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jomf.12467

DO - 10.1111/jomf.12467

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 721

EP - 736

JO - Journal of Marriage and Family

JF - Journal of Marriage and Family

SN - 0022-2445

IS - 3

ER -