Procyclical state spending in the USA

The impact of political ideology, public finance and management

Andrew Abbott, Philip Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Fiscal policy is procyclical when government expenditures and tax revenues increase during periods of economic growth and decrease during periods of economic slowdown. This paper estimates sub-central government spending and revenue cyclicality in the USA. The panel dataset comprises observations for 51 states from 1963 to 2006. The paper considers why some sub-central governments are more likely to spend procyclically. The first hypothesis is that differences in cyclicality across the states of the USA reflect differences in voters’ political ideologies. The second is that differences in cyclicality reflect differences in political networks. States are more likely to spend procyclically if the state governor is a Democrat. Ideology is relevant but the likelihood of procyclical spending is even higher if there is a coincidence between a Democratic state governor and Democratic president.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Finance and Management
Volume12
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Cyclicality
Political ideology
Public finance
Public management
Central government
Voters
Government spending
Government revenue
Fiscal policy
Ideology
Tax revenues
Economics
Government expenditure
Economic growth

Cite this

@article{323bcb2636f34bcc9380b2c92a0f785d,
title = "Procyclical state spending in the USA: The impact of political ideology, public finance and management",
abstract = "Fiscal policy is procyclical when government expenditures and tax revenues increase during periods of economic growth and decrease during periods of economic slowdown. This paper estimates sub-central government spending and revenue cyclicality in the USA. The panel dataset comprises observations for 51 states from 1963 to 2006. The paper considers why some sub-central governments are more likely to spend procyclically. The first hypothesis is that differences in cyclicality across the states of the USA reflect differences in voters’ political ideologies. The second is that differences in cyclicality reflect differences in political networks. States are more likely to spend procyclically if the state governor is a Democrat. Ideology is relevant but the likelihood of procyclical spending is even higher if there is a coincidence between a Democratic state governor and Democratic president.",
author = "Andrew Abbott and Philip Jones",
note = "Symposium on Democracy and Public Finance",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Public Finance and Management",
issn = "1523-9721",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procyclical state spending in the USA

T2 - The impact of political ideology, public finance and management

AU - Abbott, Andrew

AU - Jones, Philip

N1 - Symposium on Democracy and Public Finance

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Fiscal policy is procyclical when government expenditures and tax revenues increase during periods of economic growth and decrease during periods of economic slowdown. This paper estimates sub-central government spending and revenue cyclicality in the USA. The panel dataset comprises observations for 51 states from 1963 to 2006. The paper considers why some sub-central governments are more likely to spend procyclically. The first hypothesis is that differences in cyclicality across the states of the USA reflect differences in voters’ political ideologies. The second is that differences in cyclicality reflect differences in political networks. States are more likely to spend procyclically if the state governor is a Democrat. Ideology is relevant but the likelihood of procyclical spending is even higher if there is a coincidence between a Democratic state governor and Democratic president.

AB - Fiscal policy is procyclical when government expenditures and tax revenues increase during periods of economic growth and decrease during periods of economic slowdown. This paper estimates sub-central government spending and revenue cyclicality in the USA. The panel dataset comprises observations for 51 states from 1963 to 2006. The paper considers why some sub-central governments are more likely to spend procyclically. The first hypothesis is that differences in cyclicality across the states of the USA reflect differences in voters’ political ideologies. The second is that differences in cyclicality reflect differences in political networks. States are more likely to spend procyclically if the state governor is a Democrat. Ideology is relevant but the likelihood of procyclical spending is even higher if there is a coincidence between a Democratic state governor and Democratic president.

UR - http://www.spaef.com/article/1383/Procyclical-State-Spending-in-the-USA:-The-Impact-of-Political-Ideology

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Public Finance and Management

JF - Public Finance and Management

SN - 1523-9721

IS - 3

ER -