Probability distributions for a quantile mapping technique for a bias correction of precipitation data

A case study to precipitation data under climate change

Jun-Haeng Heo, Hyunjun Ahn, Ju-Young Shin, Thomas Kjeldsen, Changsam Jeong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The quantile mapping method is a bias correction method that leads to a good performance in terms of precipitation. Selecting an appropriate probability distribution model is essential for the successful implementation of quantile mapping. Probability distribution models with two shape parameters have proved that they are fit for precipitation modeling because of their flexibility. Hence, the application of a two-shape parameter distribution will improve the performance of the quantile mapping method in the bias correction of precipitation data. In this study, the applicability and appropriateness of two-shape parameter distribution models are examined in quantile mapping, for a bias correction of simulated precipitation data from a climate model under a climate change scenario. Additionally, the impacts of distribution selection on the frequency analysis of future extreme precipitation from climate are investigated. Generalized Lindley, Burr XII, and Kappa distributions are used, and their fits and appropriateness are compared to those of conventional distributions in a case study. Applications of two-shape parameter distributions do lead to better performances in reproducing the statistical characteristics of observed precipitation, compared to those of conventional distributions. The Kappa distribution is considered the best distribution model, as it can reproduce reliable spatial dependences of the quantile corresponding to a 100-year return period, unlike the gamma distribution.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1475
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalWater
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • bias correction
  • quantile mapping
  • climate model
  • precipitation
  • frequency analysis
  • Bias correction
  • Precipitation
  • Quantile mapping
  • Climate model
  • Frequency analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Aquatic Science
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Probability distributions for a quantile mapping technique for a bias correction of precipitation data : A case study to precipitation data under climate change. / Heo, Jun-Haeng; Ahn, Hyunjun; Shin, Ju-Young; Kjeldsen, Thomas; Jeong, Changsam.

In: Water, Vol. 11, No. 7, 1475, 16.07.2019, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d9fefc239d5549f7a5e54bf9f4177493,
title = "Probability distributions for a quantile mapping technique for a bias correction of precipitation data: A case study to precipitation data under climate change",
abstract = "The quantile mapping method is a bias correction method that leads to a good performance in terms of precipitation. Selecting an appropriate probability distribution model is essential for the successful implementation of quantile mapping. Probability distribution models with two shape parameters have proved that they are fit for precipitation modeling because of their flexibility. Hence, the application of a two-shape parameter distribution will improve the performance of the quantile mapping method in the bias correction of precipitation data. In this study, the applicability and appropriateness of two-shape parameter distribution models are examined in quantile mapping, for a bias correction of simulated precipitation data from a climate model under a climate change scenario. Additionally, the impacts of distribution selection on the frequency analysis of future extreme precipitation from climate are investigated. Generalized Lindley, Burr XII, and Kappa distributions are used, and their fits and appropriateness are compared to those of conventional distributions in a case study. Applications of two-shape parameter distributions do lead to better performances in reproducing the statistical characteristics of observed precipitation, compared to those of conventional distributions. The Kappa distribution is considered the best distribution model, as it can reproduce reliable spatial dependences of the quantile corresponding to a 100-year return period, unlike the gamma distribution.",
keywords = "bias correction, quantile mapping, climate model, precipitation, frequency analysis, Bias correction, Precipitation, Quantile mapping, Climate model, Frequency analysis",
author = "Jun-Haeng Heo and Hyunjun Ahn and Ju-Young Shin and Thomas Kjeldsen and Changsam Jeong",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "16",
doi = "10.3390/w11071475",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Water",
issn = "2073-4441",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probability distributions for a quantile mapping technique for a bias correction of precipitation data

T2 - A case study to precipitation data under climate change

AU - Heo, Jun-Haeng

AU - Ahn, Hyunjun

AU - Shin, Ju-Young

AU - Kjeldsen, Thomas

AU - Jeong, Changsam

PY - 2019/7/16

Y1 - 2019/7/16

N2 - The quantile mapping method is a bias correction method that leads to a good performance in terms of precipitation. Selecting an appropriate probability distribution model is essential for the successful implementation of quantile mapping. Probability distribution models with two shape parameters have proved that they are fit for precipitation modeling because of their flexibility. Hence, the application of a two-shape parameter distribution will improve the performance of the quantile mapping method in the bias correction of precipitation data. In this study, the applicability and appropriateness of two-shape parameter distribution models are examined in quantile mapping, for a bias correction of simulated precipitation data from a climate model under a climate change scenario. Additionally, the impacts of distribution selection on the frequency analysis of future extreme precipitation from climate are investigated. Generalized Lindley, Burr XII, and Kappa distributions are used, and their fits and appropriateness are compared to those of conventional distributions in a case study. Applications of two-shape parameter distributions do lead to better performances in reproducing the statistical characteristics of observed precipitation, compared to those of conventional distributions. The Kappa distribution is considered the best distribution model, as it can reproduce reliable spatial dependences of the quantile corresponding to a 100-year return period, unlike the gamma distribution.

AB - The quantile mapping method is a bias correction method that leads to a good performance in terms of precipitation. Selecting an appropriate probability distribution model is essential for the successful implementation of quantile mapping. Probability distribution models with two shape parameters have proved that they are fit for precipitation modeling because of their flexibility. Hence, the application of a two-shape parameter distribution will improve the performance of the quantile mapping method in the bias correction of precipitation data. In this study, the applicability and appropriateness of two-shape parameter distribution models are examined in quantile mapping, for a bias correction of simulated precipitation data from a climate model under a climate change scenario. Additionally, the impacts of distribution selection on the frequency analysis of future extreme precipitation from climate are investigated. Generalized Lindley, Burr XII, and Kappa distributions are used, and their fits and appropriateness are compared to those of conventional distributions in a case study. Applications of two-shape parameter distributions do lead to better performances in reproducing the statistical characteristics of observed precipitation, compared to those of conventional distributions. The Kappa distribution is considered the best distribution model, as it can reproduce reliable spatial dependences of the quantile corresponding to a 100-year return period, unlike the gamma distribution.

KW - bias correction

KW - quantile mapping

KW - climate model

KW - precipitation

KW - frequency analysis

KW - Bias correction

KW - Precipitation

KW - Quantile mapping

KW - Climate model

KW - Frequency analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073885151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/w11071475

DO - 10.3390/w11071475

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Water

JF - Water

SN - 2073-4441

IS - 7

M1 - 1475

ER -