Principles used to evaluate mathematical explanations

Samuel G. B. Johnson, Angie M. Johnston, Marissa L. Koven, Frank C. Keil

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Mathematics is critical for making sense of the world. Yet, little is known about how people evaluate mathematical explanations. Here, we use an explanatory reasoning task to investigate the intuitive structure of mathematics. We show that people evaluate arithmetic explanations by building mental proofs over the conceptual structure of intuitive arithmetic, evaluating those proofs using criteria similar to those of professional mathematicians. Specifically, we find that people prefer explanations consistent with the conceptual order of the operations (“9÷3=3 because 3*3=9” rather than “3*3=9 because 9÷3=3”), and corresponding to simpler proofs (“9÷3=3 because 3*3=9” rather than “9÷3=3 because 3+3+3=9”). Implications for mathematics cognition and education are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
Pages612-617
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Principles used to evaluate mathematical explanations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Johnson, S. G. B., Johnston, A. M., Koven, M. L., & Keil, F. C. (2017). Principles used to evaluate mathematical explanations. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 612-617) https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2017/cogsci17_proceedings.pdf