Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predictors of worry

  • Goldsmiths, University of London
  • University of East London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

In recent years there has been increased interest into the nature of worry. While closely related to neuroticism, worry is considered to be a separate construct. However, few studies have been conducted which investigate the combination of factors, in addition to neuroticism, that best predict worry. Using a hierarchical regression procedure, the present study attempted to determine which factors best predict worry after differences in levels of neuroticism have been taken into consideration. One hundred twenty-five adults completed the Worry Domains Questionnaire, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Spheres of Control scale, Self-consciousness scale and the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Interpersonal control, public self-consciousness and number of cognitive failures were found to add significantly to the prediction of worry. The implications of these results are discussed in light of current theories of worry and future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-80
Number of pages14
JournalAnxiety, Stress and Coping
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1998

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cognitive failures
  • Locus of control
  • Neuroticism
  • Self-consciousness
  • Worry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of worry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this