Power, fairness and trust: understanding and engaging with vaccine trial participants and communities in the setting up the EBOVAC-Salone vaccine trial in Sierra Leone

Luisa Enria, Shelley Lees, Elizabeth Smout, Thomas Mooney, Angus F. Tengbeh, Bailah Leigh, Brian Greenwood, Deborah Watson-Jones, Heidi Larson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This paper discusses the establishment of a clinical trial of an Ebola vaccine candidate in Kambia District, Northern Sierra Leone during the epidemic, and analyses the role of social science research in ensuring that lessons from the socio-political context, the recent experience of the Ebola outbreak, and learning from previous clinical trials were incorporated in the development of community engagement strategies. The paper aims to provide a case study of an integrated social science and communications system in the start-up phase of the clinical trial.
Methods: The paper is based on qualitative research methods including ethnographic observation, interviews with trial participants and key stakeholder interviews.
Results: Through the case study of EBOVAC Salone, the paper suggests ways in which research can be used to inform communication strategies before and during the setting up of the trial. It explores notions of power, fairness and trust emerging from analysis of the Sierra Leonean context and through ethnographic research, to reflect on three situations in which social scientists and community liaison officers worked together to ensure successful community engagement. Firstly, a section on “power” considers the pitfalls of considering communities as homogeneous and shows the importance of understanding intra-community power dynamics when engaging communities. Secondly, a section on “fairness” shows how local understandings of what is fair can help inform the design of volunteer recruitment strategies. Finally, a section on “trust” highlights how historically rooted rumours can be effectively addressed through active dialogue rather than through an approach focused on correcting misinformation.
Conclusion: The paper firstly emphasises the value of social science in the setting up of clinical trials, in terms of providing an in depth understanding of context and social dynamics. Secondly, the paper suggests the importance of a close collaboration between research and community engagement to effectively confront political and social dynamics, especially in the context of an epidemic.
LanguageEnglish
Article number1140
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume16
Early online date8 Nov 2016
DOIs
StatusPublished - 8 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Sierra Leone
Vaccines
Social Sciences
Clinical Trials
Communication
Research
Ebola Vaccines
Interviews
Qualitative Research
Power (Psychology)
Disease Outbreaks
Volunteers
Observation
Learning

Cite this

Power, fairness and trust : understanding and engaging with vaccine trial participants and communities in the setting up the EBOVAC-Salone vaccine trial in Sierra Leone. / Enria, Luisa; Lees, Shelley; Smout, Elizabeth ; Mooney, Thomas; Tengbeh, Angus F.; Leigh, Bailah; Greenwood, Brian; Watson-Jones, Deborah; Larson, Heidi.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 16, 1140, 08.11.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Enria, Luisa ; Lees, Shelley ; Smout, Elizabeth ; Mooney, Thomas ; Tengbeh, Angus F. ; Leigh, Bailah ; Greenwood, Brian ; Watson-Jones, Deborah ; Larson, Heidi. / Power, fairness and trust : understanding and engaging with vaccine trial participants and communities in the setting up the EBOVAC-Salone vaccine trial in Sierra Leone. In: BMC Public Health. 2016 ; Vol. 16. pp. 1-10.
@article{f20373464b2a449b9389f2e4fc527e82,
title = "Power, fairness and trust: understanding and engaging with vaccine trial participants and communities in the setting up the EBOVAC-Salone vaccine trial in Sierra Leone",
abstract = "Background: This paper discusses the establishment of a clinical trial of an Ebola vaccine candidate in Kambia District, Northern Sierra Leone during the epidemic, and analyses the role of social science research in ensuring that lessons from the socio-political context, the recent experience of the Ebola outbreak, and learning from previous clinical trials were incorporated in the development of community engagement strategies. The paper aims to provide a case study of an integrated social science and communications system in the start-up phase of the clinical trial.Methods: The paper is based on qualitative research methods including ethnographic observation, interviews with trial participants and key stakeholder interviews. Results: Through the case study of EBOVAC Salone, the paper suggests ways in which research can be used to inform communication strategies before and during the setting up of the trial. It explores notions of power, fairness and trust emerging from analysis of the Sierra Leonean context and through ethnographic research, to reflect on three situations in which social scientists and community liaison officers worked together to ensure successful community engagement. Firstly, a section on “power” considers the pitfalls of considering communities as homogeneous and shows the importance of understanding intra-community power dynamics when engaging communities. Secondly, a section on “fairness” shows how local understandings of what is fair can help inform the design of volunteer recruitment strategies. Finally, a section on “trust” highlights how historically rooted rumours can be effectively addressed through active dialogue rather than through an approach focused on correcting misinformation.Conclusion: The paper firstly emphasises the value of social science in the setting up of clinical trials, in terms of providing an in depth understanding of context and social dynamics. Secondly, the paper suggests the importance of a close collaboration between research and community engagement to effectively confront political and social dynamics, especially in the context of an epidemic.",
author = "Luisa Enria and Shelley Lees and Elizabeth Smout and Thomas Mooney and Tengbeh, {Angus F.} and Bailah Leigh and Brian Greenwood and Deborah Watson-Jones and Heidi Larson",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-016-3799-x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power, fairness and trust

T2 - BMC Public Health

AU - Enria, Luisa

AU - Lees, Shelley

AU - Smout, Elizabeth

AU - Mooney, Thomas

AU - Tengbeh, Angus F.

AU - Leigh, Bailah

AU - Greenwood, Brian

AU - Watson-Jones, Deborah

AU - Larson, Heidi

PY - 2016/11/8

Y1 - 2016/11/8

N2 - Background: This paper discusses the establishment of a clinical trial of an Ebola vaccine candidate in Kambia District, Northern Sierra Leone during the epidemic, and analyses the role of social science research in ensuring that lessons from the socio-political context, the recent experience of the Ebola outbreak, and learning from previous clinical trials were incorporated in the development of community engagement strategies. The paper aims to provide a case study of an integrated social science and communications system in the start-up phase of the clinical trial.Methods: The paper is based on qualitative research methods including ethnographic observation, interviews with trial participants and key stakeholder interviews. Results: Through the case study of EBOVAC Salone, the paper suggests ways in which research can be used to inform communication strategies before and during the setting up of the trial. It explores notions of power, fairness and trust emerging from analysis of the Sierra Leonean context and through ethnographic research, to reflect on three situations in which social scientists and community liaison officers worked together to ensure successful community engagement. Firstly, a section on “power” considers the pitfalls of considering communities as homogeneous and shows the importance of understanding intra-community power dynamics when engaging communities. Secondly, a section on “fairness” shows how local understandings of what is fair can help inform the design of volunteer recruitment strategies. Finally, a section on “trust” highlights how historically rooted rumours can be effectively addressed through active dialogue rather than through an approach focused on correcting misinformation.Conclusion: The paper firstly emphasises the value of social science in the setting up of clinical trials, in terms of providing an in depth understanding of context and social dynamics. Secondly, the paper suggests the importance of a close collaboration between research and community engagement to effectively confront political and social dynamics, especially in the context of an epidemic.

AB - Background: This paper discusses the establishment of a clinical trial of an Ebola vaccine candidate in Kambia District, Northern Sierra Leone during the epidemic, and analyses the role of social science research in ensuring that lessons from the socio-political context, the recent experience of the Ebola outbreak, and learning from previous clinical trials were incorporated in the development of community engagement strategies. The paper aims to provide a case study of an integrated social science and communications system in the start-up phase of the clinical trial.Methods: The paper is based on qualitative research methods including ethnographic observation, interviews with trial participants and key stakeholder interviews. Results: Through the case study of EBOVAC Salone, the paper suggests ways in which research can be used to inform communication strategies before and during the setting up of the trial. It explores notions of power, fairness and trust emerging from analysis of the Sierra Leonean context and through ethnographic research, to reflect on three situations in which social scientists and community liaison officers worked together to ensure successful community engagement. Firstly, a section on “power” considers the pitfalls of considering communities as homogeneous and shows the importance of understanding intra-community power dynamics when engaging communities. Secondly, a section on “fairness” shows how local understandings of what is fair can help inform the design of volunteer recruitment strategies. Finally, a section on “trust” highlights how historically rooted rumours can be effectively addressed through active dialogue rather than through an approach focused on correcting misinformation.Conclusion: The paper firstly emphasises the value of social science in the setting up of clinical trials, in terms of providing an in depth understanding of context and social dynamics. Secondly, the paper suggests the importance of a close collaboration between research and community engagement to effectively confront political and social dynamics, especially in the context of an epidemic.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3799-x

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-016-3799-x

DO - 10.1186/s12889-016-3799-x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

M1 - 1140

ER -