Power, Contribution and Dependence in NATO Burden Sharing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article offers three new types of variables for computation of the share that NATO countries should contribute to the common defence. I use Uppsala conflict data (UCDP) on conflict participation to reveal how the asymmetry in power that allows the US to define most of the framings on which NATO’s utility calculations are based, compensates for the greater material contribution made to NATO by the US. Then I follow Ringsmose’s model of NATO burden sharing and create two types of variables crucial to the calculation of burden sharing. One reveals the share of US military protection aimed at protecting its NATO allies. The other measures how much US global security efforts against tyranny and terror are dependent on NATO allies. These two variables are developed by means of computer-assisted discourse analysis of US Presidential Papers. The three new variables contribute to a more complex mathematical model on fair burden sharing, indicating at the same time that the imbalance between US and allied contributions is declining. If European allies have ever exploited the United States in the past, then at least the relationship has become more even during the past two decades.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-84
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Security
Volume28
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 13 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • NATO
  • Burden sharing
  • deterrence
  • power
  • dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Power, Contribution and Dependence in NATO Burden Sharing. / Kivimäki, Timo.

In: European Security, Vol. 28, No. 1, 13.02.2019, p. 66-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34432790a01d42a0bae4c01624b19815,
title = "Power, Contribution and Dependence in NATO Burden Sharing",
abstract = "This article offers three new types of variables for computation of the share that NATO countries should contribute to the common defence. I use Uppsala conflict data (UCDP) on conflict participation to reveal how the asymmetry in power that allows the US to define most of the framings on which NATO’s utility calculations are based, compensates for the greater material contribution made to NATO by the US. Then I follow Ringsmose’s model of NATO burden sharing and create two types of variables crucial to the calculation of burden sharing. One reveals the share of US military protection aimed at protecting its NATO allies. The other measures how much US global security efforts against tyranny and terror are dependent on NATO allies. These two variables are developed by means of computer-assisted discourse analysis of US Presidential Papers. The three new variables contribute to a more complex mathematical model on fair burden sharing, indicating at the same time that the imbalance between US and allied contributions is declining. If European allies have ever exploited the United States in the past, then at least the relationship has become more even during the past two decades.",
keywords = "NATO, Burden sharing, deterrence, power, dependence",
author = "Timo Kivim{\"a}ki",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "13",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "66--84",
journal = "European Security",
issn = "0966-2839",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power, Contribution and Dependence in NATO Burden Sharing

AU - Kivimäki, Timo

PY - 2019/2/13

Y1 - 2019/2/13

N2 - This article offers three new types of variables for computation of the share that NATO countries should contribute to the common defence. I use Uppsala conflict data (UCDP) on conflict participation to reveal how the asymmetry in power that allows the US to define most of the framings on which NATO’s utility calculations are based, compensates for the greater material contribution made to NATO by the US. Then I follow Ringsmose’s model of NATO burden sharing and create two types of variables crucial to the calculation of burden sharing. One reveals the share of US military protection aimed at protecting its NATO allies. The other measures how much US global security efforts against tyranny and terror are dependent on NATO allies. These two variables are developed by means of computer-assisted discourse analysis of US Presidential Papers. The three new variables contribute to a more complex mathematical model on fair burden sharing, indicating at the same time that the imbalance between US and allied contributions is declining. If European allies have ever exploited the United States in the past, then at least the relationship has become more even during the past two decades.

AB - This article offers three new types of variables for computation of the share that NATO countries should contribute to the common defence. I use Uppsala conflict data (UCDP) on conflict participation to reveal how the asymmetry in power that allows the US to define most of the framings on which NATO’s utility calculations are based, compensates for the greater material contribution made to NATO by the US. Then I follow Ringsmose’s model of NATO burden sharing and create two types of variables crucial to the calculation of burden sharing. One reveals the share of US military protection aimed at protecting its NATO allies. The other measures how much US global security efforts against tyranny and terror are dependent on NATO allies. These two variables are developed by means of computer-assisted discourse analysis of US Presidential Papers. The three new variables contribute to a more complex mathematical model on fair burden sharing, indicating at the same time that the imbalance between US and allied contributions is declining. If European allies have ever exploited the United States in the past, then at least the relationship has become more even during the past two decades.

KW - NATO

KW - Burden sharing

KW - deterrence

KW - power

KW - dependence

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 66

EP - 84

JO - European Security

JF - European Security

SN - 0966-2839

IS - 1

ER -