Power asymmetry and learning in teams: the moderating role of performance feedback

Gerben S. Van der Vegt, Simon B. De Jong, J. Stuart Bunderson, Eric Molleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

133 Citations (SciVal)


Past research suggests that power asymmetry within teams can have a stifling effect on team learning and performance. We argue here that this effect is contingent on whether power advantages within a team are used to advance individual or collective interests. This study considers the moderating role of one factor that can influence the individual or collective orientation of team members—the type of performance feedback that a team receives. We propose that whereas individual feedback reinforces the negative effects of power asymmetry on team learning, group feedback fosters a collective orientation within a team that transforms power differences into a stimulus for team learning. Analysis of multisource, multimethod data obtained from 218 individuals in 46 teams provided support for these hypotheses. Results also suggested that team learning mediated the relationship between power asymmetry and team performance. These findings suggest that power asymmetry can be a resource for and not just an obstacle to team learning in power-asymmetric teams.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-361
Number of pages15
JournalOrganization Science
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jul 2009
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Power asymmetry and learning in teams: the moderating role of performance feedback'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this