Abstract
Quantifying uncertainty in detected changepoints is an important problem. However it is challenging as the naive approach would use the data twice, first to detect the changes, and then to test them. This will bias the test, and can lead to anti-conservative p-values. One approach to avoid this is to use ideas from post-selection inference, which conditions on the information in the data used to choose which changes to test. As a result this produces valid p-values; that is, p-values that have a uniform distribution if there is no change. Currently such methods have been developed for detecting changes in mean only. This paper presents two approaches for constructing post-selection p-values for detecting changes in variance. These vary depending on the method used to detect the changes, but are general in terms of being applicable for a range of change-detection methods and a range of hypotheses that we may wish to test.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 128 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Statistics and Computing |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 29 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2026 |
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.Funding
This work is supported by EPSRC grant number EP/V053590/1.
Keywords
- Binary segmentation
- Breakpoint
- Changepoint detection
- Post-selection p-value
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Theoretical Computer Science
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Post-selection inference for quantifying uncertainty in changes in variance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS