Pluralism, Perspective, Order and Organization: The Fault-Lines of 21st Century ‘Cultures’ and Epistemologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

The original Two Cultures debate has been told and retold as a struggle for the moral high ground; the entitlement to define ‘culture’ and especially the route to understanding humanity. Later skirmishes and attempts to define a ‘Third culture’ snatched elements of these and the battleground shifted, with the strangely playground-sounding claims that science had ‘won’. However I will argue that more interesting features of the debate were the underlying assumptions about epistemology; how can we, and should we, proceed in understanding our world and experience, and how sixty years of intellectual and cultural developments in many fields illuminate profoundly new and apparently incompatible discourses. This wide-ranging argument will necessarily be superficial but my purpose is to draw attention to what I regard as central concerns of twenty-first century lay and expert epistemologies and why they matter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-187
Number of pages21
JournalInterdisciplinary Science Reviews
Volume41
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining 2016.

Keywords

  • binary
  • epistemology
  • metaphor
  • narrative
  • Newtonian
  • post modernism
  • quantum
  • thermodynamic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pluralism, Perspective, Order and Organization: The Fault-Lines of 21st Century ‘Cultures’ and Epistemologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this