TY - JOUR
T1 - Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters
T2 - a Critical Assessment and A Standardized Reporting of Power-Producing Vibrational Harvesters
AU - Hassanpour Amiri, Morteza
AU - Fatscher, Rose
AU - Taylor, Rebecca
AU - Rocha, Paulo
AU - Bowen, Chris
AU - Asadi, Kamal
N1 - Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Sofja Kovalevskaja Award
Horizon 2020
947897
Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the technical help of Joe Mills, Kurt Polat from the University of Bath, and Frank Keller and Alfons Bekker from the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research. Part of this research was funded by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award, and by the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research . P.R.F.R. acknowledges the support and funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 947897 ).
Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the technical help of Joe Mills, Kurt Polat from the University of Bath, and Frank Keller and Alfons Bekker from the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research. Part of this research was funded by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award, and by the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research. P.R.F.R. acknowledges the support and funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 947897).
PY - 2022/12/5
Y1 - 2022/12/5
N2 - Energy harvesting devices have emerged as an auspicious sustainable energy source for low-power electronics, where delivering electricity using conventional means is not feasible nor desirable. This clear technological impact has drawn huge attention and driven research into energy harvesting materials and devices. Reports are often published, even in high-caliber journals claiming high-efficiency devices. However, these are typically based on poorly defined or even undefined metrics and lack the details needed for re-evaluation and comparing different devices for peer assessment. The enthusiasm to publish is pushing the field towards qualitative rather than quantitative research. Here, after introducing the basic concepts of energy harvesting, randomly selected research papers on piezoelectric energy harvesting devices published over the last two decades, have been assessed. It is shown that essential parameters which are needed for a quantitative evaluation of materials and devices are missing from nearly 90% of the reviewed papers, thus rendering them less reproducible (or even irreproducible) for peer assessment. Such a frequent occurrence of improper data reporting damages the credibility and reliability of the energy harvesting field. To enhance reproducibility and facilitate progress, we herein suggest a measurement and data reporting protocol that should be followed when reporting energy harvesting devices and concomitant performances. The standardized protocol can be further adapted for other vibrational harvesters based on other mechanisms such as triboelectricity.
AB - Energy harvesting devices have emerged as an auspicious sustainable energy source for low-power electronics, where delivering electricity using conventional means is not feasible nor desirable. This clear technological impact has drawn huge attention and driven research into energy harvesting materials and devices. Reports are often published, even in high-caliber journals claiming high-efficiency devices. However, these are typically based on poorly defined or even undefined metrics and lack the details needed for re-evaluation and comparing different devices for peer assessment. The enthusiasm to publish is pushing the field towards qualitative rather than quantitative research. Here, after introducing the basic concepts of energy harvesting, randomly selected research papers on piezoelectric energy harvesting devices published over the last two decades, have been assessed. It is shown that essential parameters which are needed for a quantitative evaluation of materials and devices are missing from nearly 90% of the reviewed papers, thus rendering them less reproducible (or even irreproducible) for peer assessment. Such a frequent occurrence of improper data reporting damages the credibility and reliability of the energy harvesting field. To enhance reproducibility and facilitate progress, we herein suggest a measurement and data reporting protocol that should be followed when reporting energy harvesting devices and concomitant performances. The standardized protocol can be further adapted for other vibrational harvesters based on other mechanisms such as triboelectricity.
KW - Efficiencies
KW - Energy harvesting devices
KW - Measurements
KW - Nanogenerators
KW - Piezoelectrics
KW - Protocols
KW - Triboelectrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144072800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108073
DO - 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108073
M3 - Article
VL - 106
JO - Nano Energy
JF - Nano Energy
SN - 2211-2855
M1 - 108073
ER -