TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmaceutical industry payments to leaders of professional medical associations in Australia
T2 - Focus on cardiovascular disease and diabetes
AU - Karanges, Emily A.
AU - Ting, Natasha
AU - Parker, Lisa
AU - Fabbri, Alice
AU - Bero, Lisa
PY - 2020/3/31
Y1 - 2020/3/31
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pharmaceutical industry interactions with professional medical associations have come under scrutiny, yet industry ties among the leadership of these associations are often overlooked. The aim of this study was to investigate pharmaceutical industry payments to leaders of Australian diabetes or cardiovascular associations, and general associations serving doctors who manage these conditions. METHOD: Payments were identified using publicly available industry transparency reports (October 2015 to April 2018). RESULTS: Overall, 48/197 (24.4%) leaders received payments, predominantly for speaker (51.4%) and advisory board (25.3%) engagements. The proportion of paid leaders was higher for diabetes- and cardiovascular-specific associations (72.7% and 41.2%, respectively) than for general associations (7.6%). DISCUSSION: These findings raise concerns about industry influence on clinical practice and policy.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pharmaceutical industry interactions with professional medical associations have come under scrutiny, yet industry ties among the leadership of these associations are often overlooked. The aim of this study was to investigate pharmaceutical industry payments to leaders of Australian diabetes or cardiovascular associations, and general associations serving doctors who manage these conditions. METHOD: Payments were identified using publicly available industry transparency reports (October 2015 to April 2018). RESULTS: Overall, 48/197 (24.4%) leaders received payments, predominantly for speaker (51.4%) and advisory board (25.3%) engagements. The proportion of paid leaders was higher for diabetes- and cardiovascular-specific associations (72.7% and 41.2%, respectively) than for general associations (7.6%). DISCUSSION: These findings raise concerns about industry influence on clinical practice and policy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080840575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31128/AJGP-08-19-5041
DO - 10.31128/AJGP-08-19-5041
M3 - Article
C2 - 32113215
AN - SCOPUS:85080840575
SN - 2208-7958
VL - 49
SP - 151
EP - 154
JO - Australian Journal of General Practice
JF - Australian Journal of General Practice
IS - 3
ER -