Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pharmaceutical Industry Funding of Health Consumer Groups in Australia: A Cross-sectional Analysis

  • Alice Fabbri
  • , Swestika Swandari
  • , Edith Lau
  • , Agnes Vitry
  • , Barbara Mintzes
  • University of Sydney
  • Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia
  • University of South Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Relationships between consumer organizations and pharmaceutical manufacturers are the focus of transparency efforts in some jurisdictions, including Australia. This study describes the frequency and nature of industry sponsorship of Australian health consumer organizations and examines the link between sponsorship of the most highly funded organizations and manufacturers’ requests for public reimbursement of products for related health conditions. We downloaded 130 transparency reports covering the period January 2013 to December 2016 from the website of Medicines Australia and carried out a descriptive analysis. For the most heavily funded organizations and their sponsors, we examined Public Summary Documents of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee to identify relevant products under consideration for public reimbursement over the study period. Thirty-four pharmaceutical companies provided 1,482 sponsorships to 230 organizations, spending a total of AU$34,507,810. The top clinical areas in terms of amount of funding received were cancer, eye health, and nervous system disorders. The sponsors of the most highly funded groups were companies that in most cases had drugs under review for public reimbursement for conditions covered by these organizations. Interactions between the pharmaceutical industry and consumer organizations are common and require careful management to prevent biases that may favor sponsors’ interests above those of patients and the public.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-293
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Health Services
Volume49
Issue number2
Early online date15 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Funding

Monetary support towards the KHA-CARI guide-lines program, which provides for the support of guideline development and revision processes, peer and consumer review of new and revised guidelines, identification of relevant trials, mainte-nance of the website, and production of the KHA-CARI newsletter Funds to support the redevelopment of the Ovarian Cancer Australia resilience kits for patients with ovarian cancer Merck provided a financial grant towards a market research project conducted by Bowel Cancer Australia for research into community awareness and understanding of bowel cancer in people under 50 years of age. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The work was partially funded via a University of Sydney–Charles Perkins Centre summer scholarship. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • health consumer organizations
  • health policy
  • pharmaceutical industry
  • public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmaceutical Industry Funding of Health Consumer Groups in Australia: A Cross-sectional Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this