Perceptual inference in chronic pain an investigation into the economy of action hypothesis

Abby Tabor, Owen O'Daly, Robert Gregory, Clair Jacobs, Warren Travers, Michael A. Thacker, Lorimer Moseley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The experience of chronic pain critically alters one's ability to interact with their environment. One fundamental issue that has received little attention, however, is whether chronic pain disrupts how one perceives their environment in the first place. The Economy of Action hypothesis purports that the environment is spatially scaled according to the ability of the observer. Under this hypothesis it has been proposed that the perception of the world is different between those with and without chronic pain. Such a possibility has profound implications for the investigation and treatment of pain. The present investigation tested the application of this hypothesis to a heterogenous chronic pain population. Individuals with chronic pain (36; 27F) and matched pain-free controls were recruited. Each participant was required to judge the distance to a series of target cones, to which they were to subsequently walk. In addition, at each distance, participants used Numerical Rating Scales to indicate their perceived effort and perceived pain associated with the distance presented. Our findings do not support the Economy of Action hypothesis: there were no significant differences in distance estimates between the chronic pain and pain-free groups (F1,60=0.927; P=0.340). In addition, we found no predictive relationship in the chronic pain group between anticipated pain and estimated distance (F1,154=0.122, P=0.727), nor anticipated effort (1.171, P=0.281) and estimated distance (F1,154=1.171, P=0.281). The application of the Economy of Action hypothesis and the notion of spatial perceptual scaling as a means to assess and treat the experience of chronic pain are not supported by the results of this study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)588-593
Number of pages6
JournalThe Clinical Journal of Pain
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Chronic Pain
Aptitude
Pain
Population

Keywords

  • Economy of Action hypothesis
  • Distance perception
  • Spatial scaling
  • Bayesian inference

Cite this

Perceptual inference in chronic pain an investigation into the economy of action hypothesis. / Tabor, Abby; O'Daly, Owen; Gregory, Robert; Jacobs, Clair; Travers, Warren; Thacker, Michael A.; Moseley, Lorimer.

In: The Clinical Journal of Pain, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 588-593.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tabor, A, O'Daly, O, Gregory, R, Jacobs, C, Travers, W, Thacker, MA & Moseley, L 2016, 'Perceptual inference in chronic pain an investigation into the economy of action hypothesis', The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 588-593. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000305
Tabor, Abby ; O'Daly, Owen ; Gregory, Robert ; Jacobs, Clair ; Travers, Warren ; Thacker, Michael A. ; Moseley, Lorimer. / Perceptual inference in chronic pain an investigation into the economy of action hypothesis. In: The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2016 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 588-593.
@article{c8e63f2e49c64bbabed1021d508d0754,
title = "Perceptual inference in chronic pain an investigation into the economy of action hypothesis",
abstract = "The experience of chronic pain critically alters one's ability to interact with their environment. One fundamental issue that has received little attention, however, is whether chronic pain disrupts how one perceives their environment in the first place. The Economy of Action hypothesis purports that the environment is spatially scaled according to the ability of the observer. Under this hypothesis it has been proposed that the perception of the world is different between those with and without chronic pain. Such a possibility has profound implications for the investigation and treatment of pain. The present investigation tested the application of this hypothesis to a heterogenous chronic pain population. Individuals with chronic pain (36; 27F) and matched pain-free controls were recruited. Each participant was required to judge the distance to a series of target cones, to which they were to subsequently walk. In addition, at each distance, participants used Numerical Rating Scales to indicate their perceived effort and perceived pain associated with the distance presented. Our findings do not support the Economy of Action hypothesis: there were no significant differences in distance estimates between the chronic pain and pain-free groups (F1,60=0.927; P=0.340). In addition, we found no predictive relationship in the chronic pain group between anticipated pain and estimated distance (F1,154=0.122, P=0.727), nor anticipated effort (1.171, P=0.281) and estimated distance (F1,154=1.171, P=0.281). The application of the Economy of Action hypothesis and the notion of spatial perceptual scaling as a means to assess and treat the experience of chronic pain are not supported by the results of this study.",
keywords = "Economy of Action hypothesis, Distance perception, Spatial scaling, Bayesian inference",
author = "Abby Tabor and Owen O'Daly and Robert Gregory and Clair Jacobs and Warren Travers and Thacker, {Michael A.} and Lorimer Moseley",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AJP.0000000000000305",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "588--593",
journal = "The Clinical Journal of Pain",
issn = "0749-8047",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptual inference in chronic pain an investigation into the economy of action hypothesis

AU - Tabor, Abby

AU - O'Daly, Owen

AU - Gregory, Robert

AU - Jacobs, Clair

AU - Travers, Warren

AU - Thacker, Michael A.

AU - Moseley, Lorimer

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - The experience of chronic pain critically alters one's ability to interact with their environment. One fundamental issue that has received little attention, however, is whether chronic pain disrupts how one perceives their environment in the first place. The Economy of Action hypothesis purports that the environment is spatially scaled according to the ability of the observer. Under this hypothesis it has been proposed that the perception of the world is different between those with and without chronic pain. Such a possibility has profound implications for the investigation and treatment of pain. The present investigation tested the application of this hypothesis to a heterogenous chronic pain population. Individuals with chronic pain (36; 27F) and matched pain-free controls were recruited. Each participant was required to judge the distance to a series of target cones, to which they were to subsequently walk. In addition, at each distance, participants used Numerical Rating Scales to indicate their perceived effort and perceived pain associated with the distance presented. Our findings do not support the Economy of Action hypothesis: there were no significant differences in distance estimates between the chronic pain and pain-free groups (F1,60=0.927; P=0.340). In addition, we found no predictive relationship in the chronic pain group between anticipated pain and estimated distance (F1,154=0.122, P=0.727), nor anticipated effort (1.171, P=0.281) and estimated distance (F1,154=1.171, P=0.281). The application of the Economy of Action hypothesis and the notion of spatial perceptual scaling as a means to assess and treat the experience of chronic pain are not supported by the results of this study.

AB - The experience of chronic pain critically alters one's ability to interact with their environment. One fundamental issue that has received little attention, however, is whether chronic pain disrupts how one perceives their environment in the first place. The Economy of Action hypothesis purports that the environment is spatially scaled according to the ability of the observer. Under this hypothesis it has been proposed that the perception of the world is different between those with and without chronic pain. Such a possibility has profound implications for the investigation and treatment of pain. The present investigation tested the application of this hypothesis to a heterogenous chronic pain population. Individuals with chronic pain (36; 27F) and matched pain-free controls were recruited. Each participant was required to judge the distance to a series of target cones, to which they were to subsequently walk. In addition, at each distance, participants used Numerical Rating Scales to indicate their perceived effort and perceived pain associated with the distance presented. Our findings do not support the Economy of Action hypothesis: there were no significant differences in distance estimates between the chronic pain and pain-free groups (F1,60=0.927; P=0.340). In addition, we found no predictive relationship in the chronic pain group between anticipated pain and estimated distance (F1,154=0.122, P=0.727), nor anticipated effort (1.171, P=0.281) and estimated distance (F1,154=1.171, P=0.281). The application of the Economy of Action hypothesis and the notion of spatial perceptual scaling as a means to assess and treat the experience of chronic pain are not supported by the results of this study.

KW - Economy of Action hypothesis

KW - Distance perception

KW - Spatial scaling

KW - Bayesian inference

U2 - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000305

DO - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000305

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 588

EP - 593

JO - The Clinical Journal of Pain

JF - The Clinical Journal of Pain

SN - 0749-8047

IS - 7

ER -