Perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and dissuasive cigarettes among young adult smokers in the UK

a cross-sectional online survey

Crawford S. Moodie, Rosemary Hiscock, Jim Thrasher, Garth Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and cigarettes designed to be dissuasive. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey.UK. PARTICIPANTS: The final sample was 1766 young adult smokers, with 50.3% male and 71.6% white British. To meet the inclusion criteria, participants had to be 16-34 years old and smoke factory-made cigarettes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Salience of inserts, perceptions of inserts as information provision, perceptions of inserts on quitting, support for inserts and perceived appeal, harm and trial of three cigarettes (a standard cigarette, a standard cigarette displaying the warning 'Smoking kills' and a green cigarette). RESULTS: Half the sample indicated that they would read inserts with three-fifths indicating that they are a good way to provide information about quitting (61%). Just over half indicated that inserts would make them think more about quitting (53%), help if they decided to quit (52%), are an effective way of encouraging smokers to quit (53%) and supported having them in all packs (55%). Participants who smoked factory-made cigarettes and other tobacco products (compared with exclusive factory-made cigarette smokers), had made a quit attempt within the last 6 months (compared with those that had never made a quit attempt) or were likely to make a successful quit attempt in the next 6 months (compared with those unlikely to make a quit attempt in the next 6 months) were more likely to indicate that inserts could assist with cessation. Multivariable logistic regression modelling suggested that compared with the standard cigarette, the cigarette with warning (adjusted OR=17.71; 95% CI 13.75 to 22.80) and green cigarette (adjusted OR=30.88; 95% CI 23.98 to 39.76) were much less desirable (less appealing, more harmful and less likely to be tried). CONCLUSIONS: Inserts and dissuasive cigarettes offer policy makers additional ways of using the pack to reduce smoking.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere019662
JournalBMJ Open
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • cigarettes
  • inserts
  • packaging
  • smoking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and dissuasive cigarettes among young adult smokers in the UK : a cross-sectional online survey. / Moodie, Crawford S.; Hiscock, Rosemary; Thrasher, Jim; Reid, Garth.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 8, No. 9, e019662, 05.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d7472294dab34a3a9a84561de6eddacb,
title = "Perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and dissuasive cigarettes among young adult smokers in the UK: a cross-sectional online survey",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To explore young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and cigarettes designed to be dissuasive. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey.UK. PARTICIPANTS: The final sample was 1766 young adult smokers, with 50.3{\%} male and 71.6{\%} white British. To meet the inclusion criteria, participants had to be 16-34 years old and smoke factory-made cigarettes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Salience of inserts, perceptions of inserts as information provision, perceptions of inserts on quitting, support for inserts and perceived appeal, harm and trial of three cigarettes (a standard cigarette, a standard cigarette displaying the warning 'Smoking kills' and a green cigarette). RESULTS: Half the sample indicated that they would read inserts with three-fifths indicating that they are a good way to provide information about quitting (61{\%}). Just over half indicated that inserts would make them think more about quitting (53{\%}), help if they decided to quit (52{\%}), are an effective way of encouraging smokers to quit (53{\%}) and supported having them in all packs (55{\%}). Participants who smoked factory-made cigarettes and other tobacco products (compared with exclusive factory-made cigarette smokers), had made a quit attempt within the last 6 months (compared with those that had never made a quit attempt) or were likely to make a successful quit attempt in the next 6 months (compared with those unlikely to make a quit attempt in the next 6 months) were more likely to indicate that inserts could assist with cessation. Multivariable logistic regression modelling suggested that compared with the standard cigarette, the cigarette with warning (adjusted OR=17.71; 95{\%} CI 13.75 to 22.80) and green cigarette (adjusted OR=30.88; 95{\%} CI 23.98 to 39.76) were much less desirable (less appealing, more harmful and less likely to be tried). CONCLUSIONS: Inserts and dissuasive cigarettes offer policy makers additional ways of using the pack to reduce smoking.",
keywords = "cigarettes, inserts, packaging, smoking",
author = "Moodie, {Crawford S.} and Rosemary Hiscock and Jim Thrasher and Garth Reid",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019662",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and dissuasive cigarettes among young adult smokers in the UK

T2 - a cross-sectional online survey

AU - Moodie, Crawford S.

AU - Hiscock, Rosemary

AU - Thrasher, Jim

AU - Reid, Garth

PY - 2018/9/5

Y1 - 2018/9/5

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To explore young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and cigarettes designed to be dissuasive. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey.UK. PARTICIPANTS: The final sample was 1766 young adult smokers, with 50.3% male and 71.6% white British. To meet the inclusion criteria, participants had to be 16-34 years old and smoke factory-made cigarettes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Salience of inserts, perceptions of inserts as information provision, perceptions of inserts on quitting, support for inserts and perceived appeal, harm and trial of three cigarettes (a standard cigarette, a standard cigarette displaying the warning 'Smoking kills' and a green cigarette). RESULTS: Half the sample indicated that they would read inserts with three-fifths indicating that they are a good way to provide information about quitting (61%). Just over half indicated that inserts would make them think more about quitting (53%), help if they decided to quit (52%), are an effective way of encouraging smokers to quit (53%) and supported having them in all packs (55%). Participants who smoked factory-made cigarettes and other tobacco products (compared with exclusive factory-made cigarette smokers), had made a quit attempt within the last 6 months (compared with those that had never made a quit attempt) or were likely to make a successful quit attempt in the next 6 months (compared with those unlikely to make a quit attempt in the next 6 months) were more likely to indicate that inserts could assist with cessation. Multivariable logistic regression modelling suggested that compared with the standard cigarette, the cigarette with warning (adjusted OR=17.71; 95% CI 13.75 to 22.80) and green cigarette (adjusted OR=30.88; 95% CI 23.98 to 39.76) were much less desirable (less appealing, more harmful and less likely to be tried). CONCLUSIONS: Inserts and dissuasive cigarettes offer policy makers additional ways of using the pack to reduce smoking.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To explore young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and cigarettes designed to be dissuasive. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey.UK. PARTICIPANTS: The final sample was 1766 young adult smokers, with 50.3% male and 71.6% white British. To meet the inclusion criteria, participants had to be 16-34 years old and smoke factory-made cigarettes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Salience of inserts, perceptions of inserts as information provision, perceptions of inserts on quitting, support for inserts and perceived appeal, harm and trial of three cigarettes (a standard cigarette, a standard cigarette displaying the warning 'Smoking kills' and a green cigarette). RESULTS: Half the sample indicated that they would read inserts with three-fifths indicating that they are a good way to provide information about quitting (61%). Just over half indicated that inserts would make them think more about quitting (53%), help if they decided to quit (52%), are an effective way of encouraging smokers to quit (53%) and supported having them in all packs (55%). Participants who smoked factory-made cigarettes and other tobacco products (compared with exclusive factory-made cigarette smokers), had made a quit attempt within the last 6 months (compared with those that had never made a quit attempt) or were likely to make a successful quit attempt in the next 6 months (compared with those unlikely to make a quit attempt in the next 6 months) were more likely to indicate that inserts could assist with cessation. Multivariable logistic regression modelling suggested that compared with the standard cigarette, the cigarette with warning (adjusted OR=17.71; 95% CI 13.75 to 22.80) and green cigarette (adjusted OR=30.88; 95% CI 23.98 to 39.76) were much less desirable (less appealing, more harmful and less likely to be tried). CONCLUSIONS: Inserts and dissuasive cigarettes offer policy makers additional ways of using the pack to reduce smoking.

KW - cigarettes

KW - inserts

KW - packaging

KW - smoking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069588000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019662

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019662

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e019662

ER -