People in pain make poorer decisions

Nina Attridge, Jayne Pickering, Matthew Inglis, Edmund Keogh, Christopher Eccleston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Chronic pain affects 1 in 5 people and has been shown to disrupt attention. Here, we investigated whether pain disrupts everyday decision making. In Study 1, 1322 participants completed two tasks online: a shopping decisions task and a measure of decision outcomes over the previous 10 years. Participants who were in pain during the study made more errors on the shopping task than those who were pain-free. Participants with a recurrent pain condition reported more negative outcomes from their past decisions than those without recurrent pain. In Study 2, 44 healthy participants completed the shopping decisions task with and without experimentally-induced pain. Participants made more errors while in pain than while pain-free. We suggest that the disruptive effect of pain on attending translates into poorer decisions in more complex and ecologically valid contexts, that the effect is causal, and that the consequences are not only attentional, but financial.
LanguageEnglish
JournalPain
Early online date1 Mar 2019
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Mar 2019

Cite this

People in pain make poorer decisions. / Attridge, Nina; Pickering, Jayne; Inglis, Matthew; Keogh, Edmund; Eccleston, Christopher.

In: Pain, 01.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Attridge, Nina ; Pickering, Jayne ; Inglis, Matthew ; Keogh, Edmund ; Eccleston, Christopher. / People in pain make poorer decisions. In: Pain. 2019.
@article{6d80e0cb9f1d45e2a9af2bd3060da4e1,
title = "People in pain make poorer decisions",
abstract = "Chronic pain affects 1 in 5 people and has been shown to disrupt attention. Here, we investigated whether pain disrupts everyday decision making. In Study 1, 1322 participants completed two tasks online: a shopping decisions task and a measure of decision outcomes over the previous 10 years. Participants who were in pain during the study made more errors on the shopping task than those who were pain-free. Participants with a recurrent pain condition reported more negative outcomes from their past decisions than those without recurrent pain. In Study 2, 44 healthy participants completed the shopping decisions task with and without experimentally-induced pain. Participants made more errors while in pain than while pain-free. We suggest that the disruptive effect of pain on attending translates into poorer decisions in more complex and ecologically valid contexts, that the effect is causal, and that the consequences are not only attentional, but financial.",
author = "Nina Attridge and Jayne Pickering and Matthew Inglis and Edmund Keogh and Christopher Eccleston",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001542",
language = "English",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - People in pain make poorer decisions

AU - Attridge, Nina

AU - Pickering, Jayne

AU - Inglis, Matthew

AU - Keogh, Edmund

AU - Eccleston, Christopher

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Chronic pain affects 1 in 5 people and has been shown to disrupt attention. Here, we investigated whether pain disrupts everyday decision making. In Study 1, 1322 participants completed two tasks online: a shopping decisions task and a measure of decision outcomes over the previous 10 years. Participants who were in pain during the study made more errors on the shopping task than those who were pain-free. Participants with a recurrent pain condition reported more negative outcomes from their past decisions than those without recurrent pain. In Study 2, 44 healthy participants completed the shopping decisions task with and without experimentally-induced pain. Participants made more errors while in pain than while pain-free. We suggest that the disruptive effect of pain on attending translates into poorer decisions in more complex and ecologically valid contexts, that the effect is causal, and that the consequences are not only attentional, but financial.

AB - Chronic pain affects 1 in 5 people and has been shown to disrupt attention. Here, we investigated whether pain disrupts everyday decision making. In Study 1, 1322 participants completed two tasks online: a shopping decisions task and a measure of decision outcomes over the previous 10 years. Participants who were in pain during the study made more errors on the shopping task than those who were pain-free. Participants with a recurrent pain condition reported more negative outcomes from their past decisions than those without recurrent pain. In Study 2, 44 healthy participants completed the shopping decisions task with and without experimentally-induced pain. Participants made more errors while in pain than while pain-free. We suggest that the disruptive effect of pain on attending translates into poorer decisions in more complex and ecologically valid contexts, that the effect is causal, and that the consequences are not only attentional, but financial.

U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001542

DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001542

M3 - Article

JO - Pain

T2 - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

ER -