Penalty Zones in International Sustainability Standards: Where Improved Sustainability Doesn’t Pay

Nicole Darnall, Kostas Iatridis, Effie Kesidou, Annie Snelson-Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Adopting an International Sustainability Standard (ISS) helps firms improve their sustainability performance. It also acts as a credible market “signal” that legitimizes firms’ latent sustainability practices while improving their market value. But how do these signals function when firms adopt multiple ISSs? We show that the relationships between firms’ ISSs adoption and their market value and their sustainability performance appear positive. However, beyond a tipping point of 2 ISSs, firms’ market gains decline, even though their sustainability performance continues to improve until a tipping point of 3 ISSs. Differing tipping points create a gap that we refer to as the “penalty zone” – the place where market value declines, even though firms’ actual sustainability performance continues to improve. The penalty zone arises because of imprecisions in market signals and serves as a significant barrier to firms wishing to further their sustainability agenda through additional ISS adoption.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Early online date6 Jul 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

No funders acknowledged.

Keywords

  • international sustainability standards
  • market value
  • penalty zone
  • signal incongruence
  • signalling theory
  • sustainability performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Penalty Zones in International Sustainability Standards: Where Improved Sustainability Doesn’t Pay'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this