Pain Unstuck: The Role of Action and Motivation

Abby Tabor, Dimitri Van Ryckeghem, Monika I. Hasenbring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What is it that motivates our actions? As human beings, existing as part of complex societies, the actions we take are subject to multiple, often competing motives. Spanning non-conscious reflexes, cognitively derived choice as well as long- and short-term goals, our actions allow us to make sense of our environment. Pain disrupts action and hijacks our intentions. Whilst considered adaptive when temporary, pain that persists continues to interrupt and can threaten our ability to actively investigate a changing world. Drawing upon three complementary theoretical approaches to pain: an embodied framework, a motivational approach and the avoidance-endurance model, this review places the relationship between pain, motivation and action at its core, unpicking a dynamic process that can become stuck.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Journal of Pain
Early online date10 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Dec 2019

Keywords

  • avoidance vs. endurance
  • cognitive bias
  • embodied pain
  • motivation
  • pain unstuck

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Pain Unstuck: The Role of Action and Motivation. / Tabor, Abby; Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri; Hasenbring, Monika I.

In: Clinical Journal of Pain, 10.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tabor, Abby ; Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri ; Hasenbring, Monika I. / Pain Unstuck: The Role of Action and Motivation. In: Clinical Journal of Pain. 2019.
@article{fc895a86af51470e9d278dde611e5bfd,
title = "Pain Unstuck:: The Role of Action and Motivation",
abstract = "What is it that motivates our actions? As human beings, existing as part of complex societies, the actions we take are subject to multiple, often competing motives. Spanning non-conscious reflexes, cognitively derived choice as well as long- and short-term goals, our actions allow us to make sense of our environment. Pain disrupts action and hijacks our intentions. Whilst considered adaptive when temporary, pain that persists continues to interrupt and can threaten our ability to actively investigate a changing world. Drawing upon three complementary theoretical approaches to pain: an embodied framework, a motivational approach and the avoidance-endurance model, this review places the relationship between pain, motivation and action at its core, unpicking a dynamic process that can become stuck.",
keywords = "avoidance vs. endurance, cognitive bias, embodied pain, motivation, pain unstuck",
author = "Abby Tabor and {Van Ryckeghem}, Dimitri and Hasenbring, {Monika I.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1097/AJP.0000000000000786",
language = "English",
journal = "The Clinical Journal of Pain",
issn = "0749-8047",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain Unstuck:

T2 - The Role of Action and Motivation

AU - Tabor, Abby

AU - Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri

AU - Hasenbring, Monika I.

PY - 2019/12/10

Y1 - 2019/12/10

N2 - What is it that motivates our actions? As human beings, existing as part of complex societies, the actions we take are subject to multiple, often competing motives. Spanning non-conscious reflexes, cognitively derived choice as well as long- and short-term goals, our actions allow us to make sense of our environment. Pain disrupts action and hijacks our intentions. Whilst considered adaptive when temporary, pain that persists continues to interrupt and can threaten our ability to actively investigate a changing world. Drawing upon three complementary theoretical approaches to pain: an embodied framework, a motivational approach and the avoidance-endurance model, this review places the relationship between pain, motivation and action at its core, unpicking a dynamic process that can become stuck.

AB - What is it that motivates our actions? As human beings, existing as part of complex societies, the actions we take are subject to multiple, often competing motives. Spanning non-conscious reflexes, cognitively derived choice as well as long- and short-term goals, our actions allow us to make sense of our environment. Pain disrupts action and hijacks our intentions. Whilst considered adaptive when temporary, pain that persists continues to interrupt and can threaten our ability to actively investigate a changing world. Drawing upon three complementary theoretical approaches to pain: an embodied framework, a motivational approach and the avoidance-endurance model, this review places the relationship between pain, motivation and action at its core, unpicking a dynamic process that can become stuck.

KW - avoidance vs. endurance

KW - cognitive bias

KW - embodied pain

KW - motivation

KW - pain unstuck

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077000625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000786

DO - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000786

M3 - Article

C2 - 31833915

AN - SCOPUS:85077000625

JO - The Clinical Journal of Pain

JF - The Clinical Journal of Pain

SN - 0749-8047

ER -