Overbidding and Overspreading in Rent-seeking Experiments: Cost Structure and Prize Allocation Rules

Subhasish M. Chowdhury, Roman M. Sheremeta, Theodore L. Turocy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We study experimentally the effects of cost structure and prize allocation rules on the performance of rent-seeking contests. Most previous studies use a lottery prize rule and linear cost, and find both overbidding relative to the Nash equilibrium prediction and significant variation of efforts, which we term ‘overspreading.’ We investigate the effects of allocating the prize by a lottery versus sharing it proportionally, and of convex versus linear costs of effort, while holding fixed the Nash equilibrium prediction for effort. We find the share rule results in average effort closer to the Nash prediction, and lower variation of effort. Combining the share rule with a convex cost function further enhances these results. We can explain a significant amount of non-equilibrium behavior by features of the experimental design. These results contribute towards design guidelines for contests based on behavioral principles that take into account implementation features of a contest.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-238
Number of pages15
JournalGames and Economic Behavior
Volume87
Early online date20 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2014

Keywords

  • Rent-seeking
  • contest
  • contest design
  • experiments
  • quantal response
  • overbidding

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Overbidding and Overspreading in Rent-seeking Experiments: Cost Structure and Prize Allocation Rules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this