Organizational identity and place: a discursive exploration of hegemony and resistance

Andrew D. Brown, Michael Humphreys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyses how three distinct cohorts of workers in a recently merged UK-based college of Further Education understood their group and their organization’s identities. We focus in particular, but not exclusively on how the groups’ shared understandings of ‘place’ informed their identity accounts. Identities are theorised as being constituted within discursive regimes, and place treated as a discursive resource on which individuals and groups may draw in their attempts to author versions of their selves. In our case, understandings of place were also a resource on which some people drew in nostalgic reminiscence, and others used to fantasise about their preferred futures for the college. Framed by our intention to identify plurivocal native interpretations of place and identity in ways that promote the reading of polysemy back into case research, the contribution this paper makes is threefold. First, it adds to efforts to theorize organizations and identities as unstable social constructions constituted through acts of languaging. Second, it illustrates how different groups of local actors with distinct histories and value preferences may draw on their place of work in order to author contrasting versions of their organization’s identity. Finally, our paper analyses the attempts made by senior managers and groups of other staff to define their organization in particular ways, as hegemonic ‘moves’ in an ongoing struggle for control over the organization as a discursive space.
LanguageEnglish
Pages231-257
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of management studies
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Managers
Education
Organizational identity
Hegemony
Resources
Shared understanding
Staff
Further education
Senior managers
Case research
Workers
Cohort
Social construction

Cite this

Organizational identity and place : a discursive exploration of hegemony and resistance. / Brown, Andrew D.; Humphreys, Michael.

In: Journal of management studies, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2006, p. 231-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a3ea9f0cca50491790470693a6eba26a,
title = "Organizational identity and place: a discursive exploration of hegemony and resistance",
abstract = "This paper analyses how three distinct cohorts of workers in a recently merged UK-based college of Further Education understood their group and their organization’s identities. We focus in particular, but not exclusively on how the groups’ shared understandings of ‘place’ informed their identity accounts. Identities are theorised as being constituted within discursive regimes, and place treated as a discursive resource on which individuals and groups may draw in their attempts to author versions of their selves. In our case, understandings of place were also a resource on which some people drew in nostalgic reminiscence, and others used to fantasise about their preferred futures for the college. Framed by our intention to identify plurivocal native interpretations of place and identity in ways that promote the reading of polysemy back into case research, the contribution this paper makes is threefold. First, it adds to efforts to theorize organizations and identities as unstable social constructions constituted through acts of languaging. Second, it illustrates how different groups of local actors with distinct histories and value preferences may draw on their place of work in order to author contrasting versions of their organization’s identity. Finally, our paper analyses the attempts made by senior managers and groups of other staff to define their organization in particular ways, as hegemonic ‘moves’ in an ongoing struggle for control over the organization as a discursive space.",
author = "Brown, {Andrew D.} and Michael Humphreys",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00589.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "231--257",
journal = "Journal of management studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational identity and place

T2 - Journal of management studies

AU - Brown, Andrew D.

AU - Humphreys, Michael

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper analyses how three distinct cohorts of workers in a recently merged UK-based college of Further Education understood their group and their organization’s identities. We focus in particular, but not exclusively on how the groups’ shared understandings of ‘place’ informed their identity accounts. Identities are theorised as being constituted within discursive regimes, and place treated as a discursive resource on which individuals and groups may draw in their attempts to author versions of their selves. In our case, understandings of place were also a resource on which some people drew in nostalgic reminiscence, and others used to fantasise about their preferred futures for the college. Framed by our intention to identify plurivocal native interpretations of place and identity in ways that promote the reading of polysemy back into case research, the contribution this paper makes is threefold. First, it adds to efforts to theorize organizations and identities as unstable social constructions constituted through acts of languaging. Second, it illustrates how different groups of local actors with distinct histories and value preferences may draw on their place of work in order to author contrasting versions of their organization’s identity. Finally, our paper analyses the attempts made by senior managers and groups of other staff to define their organization in particular ways, as hegemonic ‘moves’ in an ongoing struggle for control over the organization as a discursive space.

AB - This paper analyses how three distinct cohorts of workers in a recently merged UK-based college of Further Education understood their group and their organization’s identities. We focus in particular, but not exclusively on how the groups’ shared understandings of ‘place’ informed their identity accounts. Identities are theorised as being constituted within discursive regimes, and place treated as a discursive resource on which individuals and groups may draw in their attempts to author versions of their selves. In our case, understandings of place were also a resource on which some people drew in nostalgic reminiscence, and others used to fantasise about their preferred futures for the college. Framed by our intention to identify plurivocal native interpretations of place and identity in ways that promote the reading of polysemy back into case research, the contribution this paper makes is threefold. First, it adds to efforts to theorize organizations and identities as unstable social constructions constituted through acts of languaging. Second, it illustrates how different groups of local actors with distinct histories and value preferences may draw on their place of work in order to author contrasting versions of their organization’s identity. Finally, our paper analyses the attempts made by senior managers and groups of other staff to define their organization in particular ways, as hegemonic ‘moves’ in an ongoing struggle for control over the organization as a discursive space.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00589.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00589.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00589.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 231

EP - 257

JO - Journal of management studies

JF - Journal of management studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 2

ER -