Organizational identity and organizational identification

A review of the literature and suggestions for future research

H. He, A.D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)
215 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we present an overview of the literatures on organizational identity and organizational identification. We provide overviews of four major approaches to organizational identity: functionalist, social constructionist, psychodynamic, and postmodern. The literature on organizational identification, by contrast, exhibits greater consensus due to the hegemonic power of social identity theory, and is predominantly functionalist. We review recent research on organizational identification regarding performance outcomes and antecedents (mainly focusing on leadership and the social exchange perspective), and in relation to change and virtual contexts. Some suggestions for further research are then offered. Finally an overview of the articles in this special issue is presented.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-35
Number of pages33
JournalGroup and Organization Management
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Social Identification
Research
Consensus
Identification (Psychology)
Organizational Identification
Organizational Identity
Organizational identification
Organizational identity
Functionalist
Social Theory
Power (Psychology)
Social Identity Theory
Social exchange
Social identity theory

Cite this

@article{54f28c20b95743ceace16ed60c3a8e39,
title = "Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research",
abstract = "In this article, we present an overview of the literatures on organizational identity and organizational identification. We provide overviews of four major approaches to organizational identity: functionalist, social constructionist, psychodynamic, and postmodern. The literature on organizational identification, by contrast, exhibits greater consensus due to the hegemonic power of social identity theory, and is predominantly functionalist. We review recent research on organizational identification regarding performance outcomes and antecedents (mainly focusing on leadership and the social exchange perspective), and in relation to change and virtual contexts. Some suggestions for further research are then offered. Finally an overview of the articles in this special issue is presented.",
author = "H. He and A.D. Brown",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/1059601112473815",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "3--35",
journal = "Group and Organization Management",
issn = "1059-6011",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational identity and organizational identification

T2 - A review of the literature and suggestions for future research

AU - He, H.

AU - Brown, A.D.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - In this article, we present an overview of the literatures on organizational identity and organizational identification. We provide overviews of four major approaches to organizational identity: functionalist, social constructionist, psychodynamic, and postmodern. The literature on organizational identification, by contrast, exhibits greater consensus due to the hegemonic power of social identity theory, and is predominantly functionalist. We review recent research on organizational identification regarding performance outcomes and antecedents (mainly focusing on leadership and the social exchange perspective), and in relation to change and virtual contexts. Some suggestions for further research are then offered. Finally an overview of the articles in this special issue is presented.

AB - In this article, we present an overview of the literatures on organizational identity and organizational identification. We provide overviews of four major approaches to organizational identity: functionalist, social constructionist, psychodynamic, and postmodern. The literature on organizational identification, by contrast, exhibits greater consensus due to the hegemonic power of social identity theory, and is predominantly functionalist. We review recent research on organizational identification regarding performance outcomes and antecedents (mainly focusing on leadership and the social exchange perspective), and in relation to change and virtual contexts. Some suggestions for further research are then offered. Finally an overview of the articles in this special issue is presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873471068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601112473815

U2 - 10.1177/1059601112473815

DO - 10.1177/1059601112473815

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 3

EP - 35

JO - Group and Organization Management

JF - Group and Organization Management

SN - 1059-6011

IS - 1

ER -