Organic Bioelectronics in Microphysiological Systems: Bridging the Gap Between Biological Systems and Electronic Technologies

Pauline Coquart, Andrea El Haddad, Dimitrios Koutsouras, Johanna Bolander

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The growing burden of degenerative, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and cancerous diseases necessitates innovative approaches to improve our pathophysiological understanding and ability to modulate biological processes. Organic bioelectronics has emerged as a powerful tool in this pursuit, offering a unique ability to interact with biology due to the mixed ionic–electronic conduction and tissue-mimetic mechanical properties of conducting polymers (CPs). These materials enable seamless integration with biological systems across different levels of complexity, from monolayers to complex 3D models, microfluidic chips, and even clinical applications. CPs can be processed into diverse formats, including thin films, hydrogels, 3D scaffolds, and electrospun fibers, allowing the fabrication of advanced bioelectronic devices such as multi-electrode arrays, transistors (EGOFETs, OECTs), ion pumps, and photoactuators. This review examines the integration of CP-based bioelectronics in vivo and in in vitro microphysiological systems, focusing on their ability to monitor key biological events, including electrical activity, metabolic changes, and biomarker concentrations, as well as their potential for electrical, mechanical, and chemical stimulation. We highlight the versatility and biocompatibility of CPs and their role in advancing personalized medicine and regenerative therapies and discuss future directions for organic bioelectronics to bridge the gap between biological systems and electronic technologies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number253
JournalBiosensors
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date16 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2025

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable

Acknowledgements

All figures were created with Biorender: https://www.biorender.com/ (accessed on 11 April 2025); Figure 1: Created in BioRender. Bolander, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/c3pzwz3; Figure 2: Created in BioRender. Bolander, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/bijsckp; Figure 3: Created in BioRender. Bolander, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/hle4655; Figure 4: Created in BioRender. Bolander, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pehb9xy; Figure 5: Created in BioRender. Bolander, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/ez4ntgw; Figure 6: Created in BioRender. Bolander, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/co1cwxp; Figure 7: Created in BioRender. Bolander, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/vlqqsyi.

Funding

This work was supported by the IMEC tenure track initiative (J.B.).

Keywords

  • biology–technology interface
  • conducting polymers
  • microphysiological systems
  • organic bioelectronics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biotechnology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Instrumentation
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Organic Bioelectronics in Microphysiological Systems: Bridging the Gap Between Biological Systems and Electronic Technologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this