Abstract

The construction industry is a major contributor to the global climate crisis, prompting increasing interest in minimising the embodied carbon of structures, whether through material production regulations or the optimisation of structural elements. While a wide body of literature addresses the reduction of embodied carbon in superstructures, limited attention has been devoted to the optimisation of foundations, particularly piles. This research introduces a hybrid genetic algorithm optimisation tool designed to minimise the embodied carbon of tension piles in different soil conditions. Six different pile types are analysed: solid and hollow concrete piles, steel pipes, universal column (UC) sections, and timber piles in both square and circular forms. The optimal design parameters for each pile type on undrained clay and loose sand are presented and compared. The results demonstrate the potential for reducing the embodied carbon of tension piles when utilising optimised designs. Finally, a case study involving an 8-metre-high cross-road signpost is presented, illustrating the practical application of the proposed optimisation algorithm for reducing embodied carbon in future designs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMaterials
Volume18
Issue number9
Early online date7 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2025

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Funding

The APC was funded by the University of Bath Institutional Open Access Fund. This work is part of a project supported by an EPSRC DTP studentship [number EP/T518013/1] and UK FIRES [number EP/S019111/1].

FundersFunder number
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilEP/T518013/1, EP/S019111/1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising Embodied Carbon in Axial Tension Piles: A Comparative Study of Concrete, Steel, and Timber Piles Using a Hybrid Genetic Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this