Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Stephen J Mellon, G Grammatopoulos, Michael Andersen, Hemant Pandit, Harinderjit S Gill, David Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Edge-loading in patients with metal-on-metal resurfaced hips can cause high serum metal ion levels, the development of soft-tissue reactions local to the joint called pseudotumours and ultimately, failure of the implant. Primary edge-loading is where contact between the femoral and acetabular components occurs at the edge/rim of the acetabular component whereas impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component’s edge causes secondary or contrecoup edge-loading. While the relationship between the orientation of the acetabular component and primary edge-loading has been identified, the contribution of acetabular component orientation to impingement and secondary edge-loading is less clear. Our aim was to estimate the optimal acetabular component orientation for 16 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) subjects with known serum metal ion levels. Data from motion analysis, subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling and Computed Tomography (CT) measurements were used to calculate the dynamic contact patch to rim (CPR) distance and impingement risk for 3416 different acetabular component orientations during gait, sit-to-stand, stair descent and static standing. For each subject, safe zones free from impingement and edge-loading (CPR <10%) were defined and, consequently, an optimal acetabular component orientation was determined (mean inclination 39.7° (SD 6.6°) mean anteversion 14.9° (SD 9.0°)). The results of this study suggest that the optimal acetabular component orientation can be determined from a patient’s motion and anatomy. However, ‘safe’ zones of acetabular component orientation associated with reduced risk of dislocation and pseudotumour are also associated with a reduced risk of edge-loading and impingement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-23
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume48
Issue number2
Early online date27 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Hip
Metals
Metal ions
Ions
Femur Neck
Stairs
Thigh
Serum
Gait
Anatomy
Joints
Tomography
Tissue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgery

Cite this

Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. / Mellon, Stephen J; Grammatopoulos, G; Andersen, Michael; Pandit, Hemant; Gill, Harinderjit S; Murray, David.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.2015, p. 318-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mellon, Stephen J ; Grammatopoulos, G ; Andersen, Michael ; Pandit, Hemant ; Gill, Harinderjit S ; Murray, David. / Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2015 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 318-23.
@article{1635688a200e41d18f665aa90faf4c83,
title = "Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty",
abstract = "Edge-loading in patients with metal-on-metal resurfaced hips can cause high serum metal ion levels, the development of soft-tissue reactions local to the joint called pseudotumours and ultimately, failure of the implant. Primary edge-loading is where contact between the femoral and acetabular components occurs at the edge/rim of the acetabular component whereas impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component’s edge causes secondary or contrecoup edge-loading. While the relationship between the orientation of the acetabular component and primary edge-loading has been identified, the contribution of acetabular component orientation to impingement and secondary edge-loading is less clear. Our aim was to estimate the optimal acetabular component orientation for 16 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) subjects with known serum metal ion levels. Data from motion analysis, subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling and Computed Tomography (CT) measurements were used to calculate the dynamic contact patch to rim (CPR) distance and impingement risk for 3416 different acetabular component orientations during gait, sit-to-stand, stair descent and static standing. For each subject, safe zones free from impingement and edge-loading (CPR <10{\%}) were defined and, consequently, an optimal acetabular component orientation was determined (mean inclination 39.7° (SD 6.6°) mean anteversion 14.9° (SD 9.0°)). The results of this study suggest that the optimal acetabular component orientation can be determined from a patient’s motion and anatomy. However, ‘safe’ zones of acetabular component orientation associated with reduced risk of dislocation and pseudotumour are also associated with a reduced risk of edge-loading and impingement.",
author = "Mellon, {Stephen J} and G Grammatopoulos and Michael Andersen and Hemant Pandit and Gill, {Harinderjit S} and David Murray",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.027",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "318--23",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

AU - Mellon, Stephen J

AU - Grammatopoulos, G

AU - Andersen, Michael

AU - Pandit, Hemant

AU - Gill, Harinderjit S

AU - Murray, David

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Edge-loading in patients with metal-on-metal resurfaced hips can cause high serum metal ion levels, the development of soft-tissue reactions local to the joint called pseudotumours and ultimately, failure of the implant. Primary edge-loading is where contact between the femoral and acetabular components occurs at the edge/rim of the acetabular component whereas impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component’s edge causes secondary or contrecoup edge-loading. While the relationship between the orientation of the acetabular component and primary edge-loading has been identified, the contribution of acetabular component orientation to impingement and secondary edge-loading is less clear. Our aim was to estimate the optimal acetabular component orientation for 16 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) subjects with known serum metal ion levels. Data from motion analysis, subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling and Computed Tomography (CT) measurements were used to calculate the dynamic contact patch to rim (CPR) distance and impingement risk for 3416 different acetabular component orientations during gait, sit-to-stand, stair descent and static standing. For each subject, safe zones free from impingement and edge-loading (CPR <10%) were defined and, consequently, an optimal acetabular component orientation was determined (mean inclination 39.7° (SD 6.6°) mean anteversion 14.9° (SD 9.0°)). The results of this study suggest that the optimal acetabular component orientation can be determined from a patient’s motion and anatomy. However, ‘safe’ zones of acetabular component orientation associated with reduced risk of dislocation and pseudotumour are also associated with a reduced risk of edge-loading and impingement.

AB - Edge-loading in patients with metal-on-metal resurfaced hips can cause high serum metal ion levels, the development of soft-tissue reactions local to the joint called pseudotumours and ultimately, failure of the implant. Primary edge-loading is where contact between the femoral and acetabular components occurs at the edge/rim of the acetabular component whereas impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component’s edge causes secondary or contrecoup edge-loading. While the relationship between the orientation of the acetabular component and primary edge-loading has been identified, the contribution of acetabular component orientation to impingement and secondary edge-loading is less clear. Our aim was to estimate the optimal acetabular component orientation for 16 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) subjects with known serum metal ion levels. Data from motion analysis, subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling and Computed Tomography (CT) measurements were used to calculate the dynamic contact patch to rim (CPR) distance and impingement risk for 3416 different acetabular component orientations during gait, sit-to-stand, stair descent and static standing. For each subject, safe zones free from impingement and edge-loading (CPR <10%) were defined and, consequently, an optimal acetabular component orientation was determined (mean inclination 39.7° (SD 6.6°) mean anteversion 14.9° (SD 9.0°)). The results of this study suggest that the optimal acetabular component orientation can be determined from a patient’s motion and anatomy. However, ‘safe’ zones of acetabular component orientation associated with reduced risk of dislocation and pseudotumour are also associated with a reduced risk of edge-loading and impingement.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.027

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.027

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.027

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 318

EP - 323

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 2

ER -